Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rep. Silvestre Reyes on C-Span
C-Span ^ | 12/7/06 | Rodguy911

Posted on 12/07/2006 5:31:54 AM PST by rodguy911

Reyes appearance on C-Span is very revealing about where he stands and what we can expect as he heads the intel committe in the House.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: border; iraq; militias; reyes
Reyes,Dem.Texas(acts like a pubbie) says we went into Iraq on the cheap says we needed many more troops and advocates 20,000 more now temporarily to clean up Baghdad and the militas. He is a former exec. in the Border Patrol for 26 years and Viet Nam vet.
1 posted on 12/07/2006 5:31:56 AM PST by rodguy911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rodguy911
Actually the guy is pretty impressive, when asked if other dems will go along with getting rid of the Mooktadad type militia wackjobs he said some might others won't, pretty straight forward for a dem I thought.
2 posted on 12/07/2006 5:34:06 AM PST by rodguy911 (Support The New media, Ticket the Drive-bys, --America-The land of the Free because of the Brave-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911

To this end we could really use the 6 army divisions that his Parteigenosse Klinton has disbanded.


3 posted on 12/07/2006 5:46:11 AM PST by Mi-kha-el ((There is no Pravda in Izvestiya and no Izvestiya in Pravda.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mi-kha-el
Exactly, that's part of the entire problem. We have very poor intel now a days and the "peace dividend" decimated troops and the military in general.
If we had continued with a slow steady increase in the military after Reagan won the cold war it would be a different world today IMHO. Instead we went in reverse with the military and today we pay the price.
4 posted on 12/07/2006 5:49:08 AM PST by rodguy911 (Support The New media, Ticket the Drive-bys, --America-The land of the Free because of the Brave-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911

"peace dividend" was only in the eyes of the beholder (Democrats), cause America was attacke incessantly at that period (WTC I, Embassy in Kenia, Embassy in Tanzania, USS Cole), OBL was building the terrorist force in Afghanistan unhindered, and NATO was enforcing the no-fly zones in Iraq, where the state of war never ended since Desert Storm. Doesn't look like much of a peace time to me. It was a pre-war time, and, normally, sane and responsible leaders use that time to get prepared for the impending war, build up the military, not to disarm.


5 posted on 12/07/2006 8:23:13 AM PST by Mi-kha-el ((There is no Pravda in Izvestiya and no Izvestiya in Pravda.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mi-kha-el

I would also respectfully disagree about the poor intel. We entered Iraq on the premise that Saddam did have WMD, because the burden of proof was on Saddam, not on George Bush. Saddam was supposed to have reported on what he had done with his WMD, which he was proven to have had and used against his own population and the Iranians.


6 posted on 12/07/2006 8:27:18 AM PST by Mi-kha-el ((There is no Pravda in Izvestiya and no Izvestiya in Pravda.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson