To: FLOutdoorsman
Doesn't the ink seem a little 'fresh' and what about the 'lined' paper?
Curious.
5 posted on
11/29/2006 4:34:50 PM PST by
Bigh4u2
(Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
To: Bigh4u2
Of course they had lined paper in the 15th century!
What else would their kids have put in their binders?
ROFL...
8 posted on
11/29/2006 4:43:39 PM PST by
EternalVigilance
(The RINO presidential field says it has "solutions"..."solutions" are solids watered down to nothing)
To: Bigh4u2
and what about the 'lined' paper? I've seen quite a few older writings with lined paper...though usually it is very light or they are mostly removed.
9 posted on
11/29/2006 4:45:01 PM PST by
lepton
("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
To: Bigh4u2
It does look like it was done recently. Maybe it is a copy.
13 posted on
11/29/2006 4:48:45 PM PST by
RightWhale
(RTRA DLQS GSCW)
To: Bigh4u2
Maybe they're "fake but accurate"...
70 posted on
11/30/2006 5:05:04 AM PST by
Andonius_99
(They [liberals] aren't humans, but rather a species of hairless retarded ape.)
To: Bigh4u2
what about the 'lined' paper? Common in manuscripts, but you had to rule your own lines. They also used small pinpricks to transfer lines.
75 posted on
11/30/2006 7:24:56 AM PST by
LexBaird
(98% satisfaction guaranteed. There's just no pleasing some people.)
To: Bigh4u2
You either scam your way with historical "stuff" or use grant money. Either way, you're a winner. The Turin scam is a good example of a win-win.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson