Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Omega Man II
Yep. And Arnold wants to ditch gerrymandering. What that won't do is get a lot of conservatives elected in this state.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." -Manuel II Paleologus

3 posted on 11/26/2006 11:07:15 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: goldstategop
It may or may not elect conservatives. Why fear competition? If more districts are made competitive, there are more opportunities for Republicans and conservatives.

Look what gerrymandering has gotten us: The Democrats have a very nearly two-thirds super-majority in the legislature. And, worse of all, the Democrats in the legislature are extremists and obstructionists who refuse to address things like prison overcrowding, attempts to fiercely protect pedophiles and worse.

People complain about Arnold, sure, but Angelides was the other choice. And if it comes between Arnold and Boxer in 2010, who would you rather have in the U.S. Senate between them? I'd rather have Arnold.

I'm finding a lot of cowardice here. People scream that a "real conservative" would win and yet are afraid of an opportunity to put those conservative candidates to the test before the voters.

10 posted on 11/26/2006 6:07:30 PM PST by newzjunkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson