Posted on 11/22/2006 7:51:12 AM PST by Borges
And your point is?
Excellent point!
Ditto that.
He invented rock guitar. Major oversight.
Without a doubt, Goldwater was the most influential politician of the 1960s, and one of the most influential of the 20th Century. While he lost in a landslide, his influence some 40 years later is much greater than that of the one who beat him in 1964. What other "loser" of a presidential election can make that claim.
How was he more influential than any other liberal on the SC over the last couple hundred years?
As a lawyer, he argued Brown vs. Board Of Education before the SC.
Was the elder Bennett really a more "influential American" than Pulitzer or Hearst who came later or his own contemporaries Horace Greeley of the Tribune and Henry Raymond of the Times?
Probably since Bennett came before Pulitzer and Hearst he was more influential in history than they were, but in mid-19th century America Greeley was far more important than the shady Bennett was.
51 and 81 even more - Margaret Sanger and Margaret Mead
Most certainly not with me- I'm tone deaf [glory be] and thus immune to the audible baboonery.
Or you have an agenda.
I think the reasoning may be that there are several founders -- Washington, Jefferson, Adams, Hamilton -- and votes split between them, while Lincoln is clearly the most important figure in 19th century America.
For whatever it's worth, I would put Washington above Lincoln. The founding and the Constitution were more important than what came after, but it's at least arguable that the great change in our history came in the 19th, rather than the 18th century.
It would be interesting to make a simulation and wipe off the contribution of each person on the list to the American way of life.
Wipe off Tesla's contribution and simulation would have to continue with pencil and paper. During daylight.
My point is that the physical appearance of developed areas of the US would be very different without Olmstead. That is influence.
More streets are named after MLK than Edison. But I avoid all the MLK streets because they tend to be in high crime areas.
Same reason the Wright Brothers do, apparently.
And what, no Chuck Noll?
SD
Speaking of street names, Bolling Air Force Base in Washingtom DC is on a street named Malcolm X Blvd. Can you believe this (I read the autobiography of Malcolm X and he was no saint). I worked at Bolling for a while.
> Influence doesn't necessarily mean positive effects...we're still dealing with impacts of LBJ's policies and actions. <
I'd never say that LBJ lacked influence. But I do maintain that Samuel F. B. Morse has had an influence much greater than that of ole Lyndon.
[Who ever heard of the "Johnson" code?]
> If it weren't for Polk, the entire Southwest would be equivalent to a third-world nation <
Maybe. But if Andrew Jackson hadn't won the Battle of New Orleans, the whole Mississippi River Basin plus the Southwest might now be a part of Canada!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.