So they're terrorists now? And freepers agree with that assessment? Make note of how freepers change their tune when President Hillary arrests them for far less using the same law.
I don't agree with it.
They are "terrorists" only according to the MSM spin.
If you had threatened a flight crewmember prior to 9/11 because she asked you to put your seat in an upright position for landing, you would have been in deep kim-chee back then too.
This has nothing to with sex or terrorism.
It has everything to do with threatening a flight crewmember during the performance of their duty.
Apparently, by definition somewhere.
And freepers agree with that assessment?
Not this one, anyway. "Serious consequences" does not necessarily sound like a physical threat, just a big mouth.
Imo, they should not have offended the other passengers once they found out the other passengers were being offended (which might not take much nowadays).
BTW, are we 'profiling' male muslims 15 to 45 years old yet?
Uh Huh. Thought so.