Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/14/2006 1:16:20 PM PST by Zakeet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Zakeet

Obligatory picture of the Official Airbus Repair Kit

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

2 posted on 11/14/2006 1:21:19 PM PST by TommyDale (Iran President Ahmadinejad is shorter than Tom Daschle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet; COEXERJ145; microgood; liberallarry; cmsgop; shaggy eel; RayChuang88; Larry Lucido; ...

This is not a laughing matter.

If you want on or off my aerospace ping list, please contact me by Freep mail.


3 posted on 11/14/2006 1:24:06 PM PST by Paleo Conservative (Karl Rove isn't magnificent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet

Oh, I see... It's Australian. I did not think that a European media outlet would use the term "troubled."


4 posted on 11/14/2006 1:26:29 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet

I got their power 8.


7 posted on 11/14/2006 1:36:53 PM PST by DungeonMaster (Man defiles a rock when he chips it with a tool. Ex 20:25)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet

It would make a hell of a lawn ornament.


8 posted on 11/14/2006 1:45:12 PM PST by taxed2death (A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet

I was flipping channels a week or two when I came across a show on the Airbus. It must have been a year or two old as it was all praise on how well things were working out with parts being built all over Europe.

Anyway, this was on the very first one to be completed, and they were showing one of the last parts to be put on the plane. It was somewhere on top near the tail. I have no idea what it was for, but it looked like a small intrument package. There was a cable connection that had to be made once it was to be inserted.

To the embarrassment of the engineer/technician/factory worker, the connection was about two inches too short.

They could not install that last piece. It was not clear how they resolved that issue, but I was thinking to myself, I sometimes have problem when I build things myself, but if my bookcase falls apart no big whoops.

I would think these things would be engineered to the point where everything fit, the first time.


9 posted on 11/14/2006 1:54:26 PM PST by CIB-173RDABN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet

We will not launch the A350 without Power 8

More please, s'more government subsidies, please...


10 posted on 11/14/2006 2:02:21 PM PST by JohnLongIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet
Airbus plans to outsource $3.5 bln of new work

LONDON (Reuters) - Airbus plans to outsource an estimated $3.5 billion worth of work on its new mid-sized jet, dubbed A350XWB, in a bid to cut development costs for EADS, its Franco-German parent, the Financial Times said on Tuesday.

Unnamed senior executives at the aircraft maker told the newspaper that Airbus hoped to raise the proportion of outsourcing on the project to near 50 percent from 30 percent.

EADS, the European aerospace group, has estimated that the A350XWB would cost $12 billion or more to develop and was expected to decide in the coming weeks whether to continue with the project, according to the FT.

A comment from Airbus was not immediately available.

The future of Airbus has been clouded by the announcement of costly delays to its flagship A380 superjumbo program and doubts about whether it can launch the A350XWB.
11 posted on 11/14/2006 2:02:36 PM PST by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet

Power 8 will have soo much government interference, it will never be implemented successfully. The french are going to turn around and blackmail Germany, Spain, and UK into giving them the billions in launch subsides they will need to fund the A350 development.

They simply cannot do the A350 project. I would be completely surrending the widebody commercial airplane market to Boeing for 20+ years. Their pride would never allow it, even if the project ends up just like the A380 and never is profitable.


13 posted on 11/14/2006 2:14:11 PM PST by Proud_USA_Republican (We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good. - Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet
"We cannot launch a new program if we are not sure of being in a competitive situation,'' he said.

Hmmm, that didn't seem to slow their decision re. the A380.

.

14 posted on 11/14/2006 2:18:23 PM PST by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet

"AIRBUS would decide before the end of the month on whether to go ahead with its A350 jetliner, with the launch dependent on the success of a restructure, chief executive Louis Gallois said today."

This has to be a bunch of baloney. I really can't see how Airbus competes with Boeing in significant market segments without the A350.

Could Airbus really forgo the A350 and not be relegated to a tier below Boeing for a decade or more?


16 posted on 11/14/2006 2:32:33 PM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet

When all else fails, copy the Americans!

Hey, I know - what if we got James Baker to head up the Power 8 effort?


20 posted on 11/14/2006 3:32:32 PM PST by Tenyaka (Buy American!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet

Proof that Boeing was crazy like a fox when they initially looked at a super-jumbo. Airbus jumped on the idea and sunk billions into development about the time being went the Dreamliner route... Now Airbus is too heavily invested in the A380- and cannot touch Boeing. Unless they get their A380 problems straightened out and get a lot of units produced and out the door (delivered) and a BUNCH more orders- they are going to have to worry about a lot more than the A350's future- they will be trying to figure out if Airbus has a future...


23 posted on 11/14/2006 4:54:50 PM PST by TheBattman (I've got TWO QUESTIONS for you....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet

They are going to take the black aluminum approach to the A350. Boeing considered and rejected the black aluminum approach. Their savings in weight,parts count, labor etc would be negated.

The black aluminum approach is alot like the current method of building an airplane. That is attaching composite panels to a composite airframe instead of aluminum.


34 posted on 11/15/2006 4:52:13 PM PST by TwelveStep (black aluminum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson