[Coyoteman]

Some of our long-time friends and colleagues have departed; and oh! I’ll miss them. I hope they’ll be back soon.

Coming out of retirement for one post:

I obviously have not yet read your book, but from your past posts here, and the table of contents you posted from your new book, you are still doing apologetics and philosophy, not science.

There really is a difference.

[an amused spectator]

There really is a difference.

Yes - science is the child of philosophy.

[AndrewC]

I obviously have not yet read your book, but from your past posts here, and the table of contents you posted from your new book, you are still doing apologetics and philosophy, not science.

So? Falsifiability is a philosophical concept.

[Alamo-Girl]

Thank you for your reply!

I obviously have not yet read your book, but from your past posts here, and the table of contents you posted from your new book, you are still doing apologetics and philosophy, not science.

Interesting, I'm not aware of anyone "doing" science by writing a book - publishing observations and theories for sure, but not "doing."

At any rate, we'll let the readers decide whether or not we approached all the issues of science, faith and culture, appropriately.