Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cgk
Pardon me - but appellate argument before the Supreme Court is highly specialized. Hiring a former Solicitor General of the United States is not a bad idea. It's not criminal defense at that stage of the process.
4 posted on 11/13/2006 12:02:13 PM PST by Wally_Kalbacken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Wally_Kalbacken
Hiring a former Solicitor General of the United States is not a bad idea

I could never be a criminal defense lawyer or a criminal appeals lawyer unless I could make a decent living representing those that *I* was either convinced of being innocent or at least strongly suspected that they were innocent.

I can't,for the life of me,understand how lawyers who represent the likes of OJ and Skakil can sleep at night.

12 posted on 11/13/2006 12:10:53 PM PST by Gay State Conservative ("An empty limousine pulled up and Hillary Clinton got out")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Wally_Kalbacken

Olsen probably was interested in the legal argument more than the client. It is an interesting legal question. Law & Order has done similarly themed shows, especially on catching somebody 20 years later who committed murder as a teen. Or catching somebody who said something incriminating pre miranda, and does it count. Ted Olsen just likely wanted to argue the law here with not a great shot of winning, plus he got paid well I am sure.


28 posted on 11/13/2006 12:35:39 PM PST by dogbyte12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson