You appear to be emotionally invested in maintaining an aura of infallibilty in Farah's writing. The radio and TV news reports were as I stated. As I said you can take me at my word or not, it doesn't matter to me. The bottom line is that Farrah misrepresented the facts to make a point. That's the same tactic Air America types employ.
I have no interest in Farah whatsoever. I very rarely read Farah or WND, and I have never posted him before. And if you read my last post (#25) you'll see no emotional investment. You would be more persuasive if you would simply provide the facts as requested, and refrain from ad-hominem insinuations.
You asserted that "farah conveniently left out the part of the change that requires each applicant to document an on-going process of treatment leading to a complete 'sex-change' procedure." That's quite significant, if true, but you have been asked twice to document this, and have twice declined. (Why?)
The link I provided to the Washington Post article on this, did not report any such requirement. Again, can you document that this is a requirement? All it would take is a link. I'd be interested in seeing it.