Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/08/2006 5:27:19 AM PST by teddyballgame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: teddyballgame
LOL, Conservative media are useless, as was proved last nite.

Which is why the MSM runs rings around them.
2 posted on 11/08/2006 5:29:43 AM PST by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: teddyballgame

I wish I believed that whole we won't bug out of Iraq or raise taxes part.

The moonbats are going to SCREAM to get out of Iraq. As for the taxes, we have chance on that since they don't expire for a few more years.


3 posted on 11/08/2006 5:29:51 AM PST by LadyNavyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: teddyballgame
The Presidency of George W. Bush has just begun!

This is the measure of a wrestler, exhausted in the last two minutes and starting down.

5 posted on 11/08/2006 5:32:40 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: teddyballgame
Best analysis I've seen so far on the GOP's demise.

By standing in vague but passionate opposition to the president's handling of the war, they formed a new voting alliance - an alliance between doves, who think Iraq was a mistake to begin with, and one-time hawks who think Iraq was a perfectly fine thing to do in the first place, but that it's a huge mess now and Bush should pay.

Going for that anti-Iraq alliance without offering an escape plan of their own was a brilliant political tactic.

I know several of those "one-time hawks" - GOP - who think Iraq is a big mess and were not enthused at all to vote for GOP candidates. Not voting or voting for Democrats was the way many former Bush supporters meted out their disappointment in the way things are going in Iraq (or at least in the way the MSM portrays how things are going in Iraq).

7 posted on 11/08/2006 5:35:44 AM PST by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: teddyballgame

It will now be two years of Democratic investigations, stonewalling Bush's policies, stonewalling winning in iraq, implementation of bad policies to make Bush look bad because, ...

... now the Dems will focus on the White House in 2008.

Everything they do will be in an effort to win the Presidency in 2008.


13 posted on 11/08/2006 5:47:02 AM PST by JustDoItAlways
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: teddyballgame

The same thing could have been said about Clinton in '94. It didn't happen then because, whatever his many flaws, Clinton was a skillful political player and used his opponents' mistakes against them. I guess we'll see if Bush is also skillful this way. I'm cautiously pessimistic.


16 posted on 11/08/2006 5:49:13 AM PST by jalisco555 ("Dogs look up to us, cats look down on us and pigs treat us as equals" Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: teddyballgame

This is a victory for the terrorists. Prepare for more terrorist attacks in the U.S.


17 posted on 11/08/2006 5:49:31 AM PST by pleikumud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: teddyballgame
I think the Congress got it's own vote of no confidence as much if not more than the President.

However, maybe I'm wrong. After all I felt that the Republicans in the House were doing their jobs much better than those in the Senate that couldn't even gather votes to get Bolton an up pr down confirmation vote.

I would have been much happier if voters would have supported the work the House had tried to do but was stopped by the Senate.

Here in Ohio I'm disgusted to see that Brown will be our new Senator, but I can't say I'm sorry to see DeWine will be leaving office.

18 posted on 11/08/2006 5:49:45 AM PST by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: teddyballgame
With Democrats holding some sway on Capitol Hill, Bush will no longer get his way. He will, instead, become a caretaker. And maybe, in the end, that's a good thing - because he can spend the final 25 months of his presidency focusing exclusively on securing a victory in Iraq.

He hasn't been doing anything else, anyway, so what will change? ;)

20 posted on 11/08/2006 5:51:15 AM PST by Mr. Jeeves ("When the government is invasive, the people are wanting." -- Tao Te Ching)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: teddyballgame
Well Bush fought the democrats and the war in Iraq with Compassionate Conservatism

Maybe he didn't give Teddy enough Popcorn

Yeah the MSM is a big problem but it wasn't the MSM who failed to veto CFR--Failed to clear the Clintonites out of the goverment--wanted Harriet Myers on the court--didn't run a war in Iraq like he should have been run--left Sandy Berger off the hook --was completely out of touch on Illegal Immigration --etc etc
30 posted on 11/08/2006 5:55:48 AM PST by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

And since one of the results of this election has been the election of more moderate Democrats, last night's new Congressmen will serve as a check on liberal-to-radical Dems who seem determined to turn themselves into proctologists investigating every internal aspect of the Bush administration.

Sorry John, but I think that you're completely wrong here. Remember who RUNS the democratic party. Remember who holds the pursestrings. Remember who's in the leadership positions. Those newly elected members of congress, most of whom were elected BECAUSE they ran as "moderates" or even "conservatives" will find that if they want to have an office bigger than a coffin, or be assigned to any committees, they're going to have to go along with the hard leftists on pretty much every issue.

Mark

31 posted on 11/08/2006 5:56:20 AM PST by MarkL (When Kaylee says "No power in the `verse can stop me," it's cute. When River says it, it's scary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: teddyballgame

Interesting. The Democrats are celebrating a victory and the MSM is saying the Democrats didn't win. Bush lost.

Kinda makes the whole "Democrat agenda" thing look like a booger.


43 posted on 11/08/2006 6:04:27 AM PST by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: teddyballgame

I wish people would stop using the phrase Lame Duck. The President can still do everything he could do yesterday. He just has less time to do it.


59 posted on 11/08/2006 6:25:15 AM PST by Democratshavenobrains
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: teddyballgame

I blame GWB and Karl Rove for this mess. With this shamnesty that proved the GOP is just as weak as the Dems.


60 posted on 11/08/2006 6:26:16 AM PST by lone star annie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: teddyballgame
Why do all the media pundits blame President George Bush for losing the House and, possibly, Senate?
It's not his fault.

It's the fault of the GOP in general, not President Bush's fault in particular.

61 posted on 11/08/2006 6:26:54 AM PST by Just another Joe (Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: teddyballgame

I'd just like to say at this point that, with very few honorable exceptions ('sup, Mr. Steyn?) I think the conservative commentariat has been largely feckless over the last year. So frankly, I think their first priority after the election is to go get fecked.


75 posted on 11/08/2006 7:15:18 AM PST by RichInOC ("...the people know what they want and deserve to get it good and hard."-H. L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: teddyballgame
And since one of the results of this election has been the election of more moderate Democrats, last night's new Congressmen will serve as a check on liberal-to-radical Dems who seem determined to turn themselves into proctologists investigating every internal aspect of the Bush administration.

Bullsh!t. Any one of these freshman so-called "moderate Dims" who doesn't strictly follow the extreme-left party line as laid out by Pelosi and her minions will have a very unpleasant single term in the House. That fact will be made crystal-clear to them in the coming days and weeks by the Dim leadership.

76 posted on 11/08/2006 7:18:04 AM PST by CFC__VRWC (AIDS, abortion, euthanasia - Don't liberals just kill ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: teddyballgame

 

 

79 posted on 11/08/2006 7:20:23 AM PST by Incorrigible (If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: teddyballgame

This is bullcrap - the dems who took the senate had better vote for the conservative judges or they will be shown as liars and not supporting the policies they were elected on. Most of the general public is too stupid to realize who is pulling the striings but that is the way it is.


91 posted on 11/08/2006 8:02:37 AM PST by sasafras (("Licentiousness destroyes order, and when chaos ensues, the yearning for order will destroy freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: teddyballgame
Rangel will defund the war.
92 posted on 11/08/2006 8:07:07 AM PST by DanFM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson