To: xtinct
Is it too early to refer to him as the disgraced Barack Obama?
2 posted on
11/04/2006 11:23:06 PM PST by
FlingWingFlyer
(Stop the DemocRATS' Jihad against America! Vote Republican on November 7th!!!!)
To: FlingWingFlyer
No, not at all. And I think that that's exactly how we should refer to him, from here on out. :-)
6 posted on
11/04/2006 11:26:08 PM PST by
nopardons
To: FlingWingFlyer
8 posted on
11/04/2006 11:27:46 PM PST by
maggief
To: FlingWingFlyer; xtinct
<< Is it too early to refer to him as the disgraced Barack Obama? >>
Do bears poo in the woods?
Is the Pope a Catholic?
Is Bwana Obama a "Democrat?"
22 posted on
11/05/2006 12:09:49 AM PST by
Brian Allen
("Moral issues are always terribly complex, for someone without principles." - G K Chesterton)
To: FlingWingFlyer
Is it too early to refer to him as the disgraced Barack Obama?Heck no. After two years, they're already calling him the New Jack Kennedy.
27 posted on
11/05/2006 12:44:54 AM PST by
L.N. Smithee
(MSM cries crocodile tears about negative campaigns -- they ARE a negative campaign against the GOP!)
To: FlingWingFlyer
I am so unimpressed by this guy. Some of the earlier things he said are just overtly hateful and racist. Furthermore, his father is Muslim--great, just great. And every one of his votes has been liberal. How can anyone think that he's a "uniter"?
He's going to be the media darling for the next two years so I guess I better keep my opinions to myself or be considered a racist. Frankly, I think that the only thing he will do for the Dems is dilute black support of Hillary and when that happens, the press will turn on him like a lazy-susan. In the long run, I just can't see a guy whose name Ted Kennedy can't even say winning a national election.
28 posted on
11/05/2006 12:45:00 AM PST by
MHT
To: FlingWingFlyer
Unfortunately (because of the liberal media system) I seem it comes out too late to help Republicans for these elections.
30 posted on
11/05/2006 12:48:53 AM PST by
Alex1977
To: FlingWingFlyer
45 posted on
11/05/2006 6:18:19 AM PST by
ShowMeMom
(America: The home of the FREE because of the BRAVE.)
To: FlingWingFlyer
If it ain't Barack, don't fix it.
51 posted on
11/05/2006 7:45:49 AM PST by
fhayek
To: FlingWingFlyer
Is it too early to refer to him as the disgraced Barack Obama?
He should be referred to as the disgraced Barack Hussein Obabama, Jr.
63 posted on
11/05/2006 9:03:35 AM PST by
jimbo123
To: FlingWingFlyer
Exactly what occurred to me. The title of the article would also have been:
Sen. Obama linked to DISGRACED fundraiser
71 posted on
11/05/2006 10:08:34 AM PST by
windchime
(I consider the left one of the fronts on the WOT.)
To: FlingWingFlyer
74 posted on
11/05/2006 10:35:10 AM PST by
Dante3
To: FlingWingFlyer
78 posted on
11/05/2006 12:27:07 PM PST by
2harddrive
(...House a TOTAL Loss.....)
To: FlingWingFlyer
No it is not too early,but you might want to refer to him as Osama Obama
To: FlingWingFlyer
Is it too early to refer to him as the disgraced Barack Obama? Just refer to hiom as B.O. need I say more?
95 posted on
11/05/2006 10:20:40 PM PST by
Go Gordon
(I don't know what your problem is, but I bet its hard to pronounce)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson