Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Windows attack can kill firewall
Infoworld ^ | 30 October 2006 | Robert McMillan

Posted on 10/31/2006 4:03:06 PM PST by ShadowAce

Hackers have published code that could let an attacker disable the Windows Firewall on certain Windows XP machines.

The code, which was posted on the Internet early Sunday morning, could be used to disable the Windows Firewall on a fully patched Windows XP PC that was running Windows' Internet Connection Service (ICS). This service allows Windows users to essentially turn their PC into a router and share their Internet connection with other computers on the local area network (LAN.) It is typically used by home and small-business users.

The attacker could send a malicious data packet to another PC using ICS that would cause the service to terminate. Because this service is connected to the Windows firewall, this packet would also cause the firewall to stop working, said Tyler Reguly, a research engineer at nCircle Network Security Inc., who has blogged about the issue.

"Once the firewall is down, where's your line of defense?" he said Monday, in an interview.

By knocking off the Windows Firewall, a criminal could open the door to new types of attacks, but there are a number of factors that make such an attack scenario unlikely, Reguly said.

For example, the attacker would have to be within the LAN in order to make the attack work, and, of course, it would only work on systems using ICS, which is disabled by default. Furthermore, the attack would have no effect on any third-party firewall being used by the PC, Reguly said.

Users can avoid the attack by disabling ICS, Reguly said. But this will also kill the shared Internet connection.

An easier solution, may be for ICS users to simply move their networks onto a router or NAT (Network Address Translation) device, said Stefano Zanero, chief technology officer with Secure Network SRL. "They are so cheap right now, and in many cases they offer better protection and a easier administration of your LAN," he said via instant message.

Windows XP appears to be the only platform affected by this attack, which has not been successfully reproduced on Windows Server 2003, Reguly said.

Microsoft 's initial investigation into the matter "has concluded that the issue only impacts users of Windows XP," the company's public relations agency said Monday in a statement. "Microsoft is not aware of any attacks attempting to use the reported vulnerability or of customer impact at this time."


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: firewalls; lowqualitycrap; microshaft; windows
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

1 posted on 10/31/2006 4:03:07 PM PST by ShadowAce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rdb3; chance33_98; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; Bush2000; PenguinWry; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; ...

2 posted on 10/31/2006 4:03:20 PM PST by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
"Once the firewall is down, where's your line of defense?" he said Monday, in an interview.

Where it should be ... on a network appliance.

3 posted on 10/31/2006 4:04:10 PM PST by Centurion2000 (To liberals: Dead enemies need no political or diplomatic solutions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000
Yup--Also "the attacker would have to be within the LAN in order to make the attack work, and, of course, it would only work on systems using ICS, which is disabled by default. Furthermore, the attack would have no effect on any third-party firewall being used by the PC"
4 posted on 10/31/2006 4:05:43 PM PST by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
..."has concluded that the issue only impacts users of Windows XP,"...

Oh well that's OK then. It'll only affect a few million people.

5 posted on 10/31/2006 4:06:12 PM PST by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Do these people really have nothing better to do?


6 posted on 10/31/2006 4:08:09 PM PST by FReepapalooza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale; MikefromOhio

The arms race continues.


7 posted on 10/31/2006 4:08:40 PM PST by Perdogg (Democratic Party - The political wing of Al Qaida)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FReepapalooza
Do these people really have nothing better to do?

Ya gotta wonder, don't ya?

8 posted on 10/31/2006 4:09:00 PM PST by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Short sighted thinking there when it comes to the 3rd party firewall. If the attacker can shut down the Windows firewall, what else could the attacker do if they are interested in doing something? There would have to be a hole that would allow them to run their code to shut down the firewall. If they've breached the system to that point, they can likely do any number of other things that might not be in the proof of concept code.


9 posted on 10/31/2006 4:10:33 PM PST by perfect_rovian_storm (Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: facedown

I was thinking the same thing.


10 posted on 10/31/2006 4:10:45 PM PST by DollyCali (Don't tell GOD how big your storm is -- Tell the storm how B-I-G your God is!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Does anyone still use ICS?


11 posted on 10/31/2006 4:11:02 PM PST by Redcloak (Speak softly and wear a loud shirt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

I've never used the windows firewall. I don't think it's all that good.


12 posted on 10/31/2006 4:11:06 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

An interesting, but lame hack. You've already got to be inside the firewall to do it. Somebody who's building their network using ICS is already not very serious about security.

The firewall belongs on a box upstream of the LAN anyway.


13 posted on 10/31/2006 4:11:49 PM PST by Ramius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
Users can avoid the attack by disabling ICS, Reguly said. But this will also kill the shared Internet connection.

Why not just get a cheap router with a hardware-based firewall built in?

14 posted on 10/31/2006 4:11:51 PM PST by Mr Ramsbotham (Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak
Does anyone still use ICS?

Dial-up users still gotta use it, I believe.

15 posted on 10/31/2006 4:12:13 PM PST by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Anything but a hardware firewall is useless anyway.


16 posted on 10/31/2006 4:12:56 PM PST by sumocide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Oh yeah... You have a point there. And here I was hoping for a minor MSFT screwup.


17 posted on 10/31/2006 4:13:28 PM PST by Redcloak (Speak softly and wear a loud shirt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000
Where it should be ... on a network appliance.

Remember, we are dealing with users here.

Users....at home.

Appliance? My stove is ok. Fridge is keeping the beer cold. Check.

18 posted on 10/31/2006 4:14:31 PM PST by LasVegasMac (Islam........not fit for human consumption.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sumocide
Anything but a hardware firewall is useless anyway.

Technically, there's no such thing. What you're thinking of is an appliance that only runs firewall software. While they're usually better than the Windows firewall, they still consist of just software.

19 posted on 10/31/2006 4:14:43 PM PST by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: FReepapalooza
Do these people really have nothing better to do?

Actually no they don't. Finding exploits and examining code is literally the purpose of some of these hackers' lives.

20 posted on 10/31/2006 4:16:24 PM PST by Centurion2000 (To liberals: Dead enemies need no political or diplomatic solutions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson