1 posted on
10/30/2006 9:29:30 AM PST by
presidio9
To: presidio9
With some help from God, Charles will never be king.
2 posted on
10/30/2006 9:30:47 AM PST by
Spktyr
(Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
To: presidio9
FWIW, I wouldn't want this guy defending my faith....
3 posted on
10/30/2006 9:30:54 AM PST by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: presidio9
There are two problems with this:
1) I have yet to see substantive evidence that Prince Charles has any faith in any recognizable relgion.
2) even if he did, the Anglican Church in England has no recognizable doctrinal stance, therefore no recognizable faith to defend.
5 posted on
10/30/2006 9:32:32 AM PST by
BelegStrongbow
(www.stjosephssanford.org: Ecce Pactum, id cape aut id relinque)
To: presidio9
King Moron suits me. I think he looks too much like Cindy Sheehan. I don't care for anything he does and I think the best thing he ever had was Princess Diana. He messed that up royally too the dope.
7 posted on
10/30/2006 9:34:13 AM PST by
pandoraou812
( barbaric with zero tolerance and dilligaf?)
To: presidio9
Without the Christian faith, there would be no freedom to practice the other religions. Defend whose faith? Muslims? They'll never defend yours...
8 posted on
10/30/2006 9:35:20 AM PST by
pgyanke
(We can't share the blessings of peace with those for whom violence is holy imperative. -andy58-in-nh)
To: presidio9
I think Charles is playing 'em. A few years ago, there was a question of whether he should be "Defender of the Faith," the nominal head of the CoE, with his divorce and his documented adultery -- now he's got 'em down to arguing over a definite article.
To: presidio9
Ever seen the statue?
15 posted on
10/30/2006 9:39:25 AM PST by
evets
(pumkin beer.)
To: presidio9
If "the Faith" is depending on a reprobate like Charles to defend it, it is truly in a precarious state.
24 posted on
10/30/2006 9:54:56 AM PST by
Elpasser
To: presidio9
Arguing over his proper title are they?
How about "Lord Tampon"?
That would be worth at least a giggle from Lady Camilla. ;)
26 posted on
10/30/2006 9:58:42 AM PST by
mkjessup
(The Shah doesn't look so bad now, eh? But nooo, Jimmah said the Ayatollah was a 'godly' man.)
To: presidio9
Better yet, skip Chuckie and crown William.
29 posted on
10/30/2006 10:05:17 AM PST by
mtbopfuyn
(I think the border is kind of an artificial barrier - San Antonio councilwoman Patti Radle)
To: presidio9
"It's got to be a much more interfaith coronation service next time around. Prince Charles put his finger on it and there's no way in which the sovereign can be defender of one faith. Let me guess - the liberal elite Brits think Muslims will reciprocate when they're in charge?
" We'll be ever so tolerant now, and you'll be ever so tolerant when it's your turn". Dream on, Brits. They won't.
Christianity will be outlawed. Tolerance will be cease to exist. If Prince Charles and gang had been running the show in the 40's we'd all be speaking German.
32 posted on
10/30/2006 10:09:06 AM PST by
GOPJ
(In the War with radical Islam, it's not "for" or "against"-- it's victory or ruin.)
To: presidio9
33 posted on
10/30/2006 10:09:48 AM PST by
USF
(I see your Jihad and raise you a Crusade ™ © ®)
To: presidio9
God save their gracious Queen,
Long live their noble Queen,
God save the Queen!
42 posted on
10/30/2006 10:39:31 AM PST by
omega4412
(Multiculturalism kills. 9/11, Beslan, Madrid, London)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
