Well since his opponent did question Murphy's survice then I suppose it's a legitimate question. What has Fitzgerald done to defend his country?
Hold on there. Fitzpatrick never served, but if Murphy is lying then it's a legitimate attack. As a veteran I am far more offended by fake war hero crap than I am by people who have not served expecting to hold positions in a civilian government. Offering your blood to this nation should be enough, and is enough, for most vets to be proud of. Embellishment ususally points to a serious character problem.
Is there some reason a civilian is not allowed to discuss evidence of lying by a veteran of the armed forces?