[Fairview]

So let me see. If my sistagals and I are walking down the street armed with our LadySmiths, and we see a cute young gentleman who is not covered from head to toe in black cloth, by the imam's reasoning we ought to be able to make free with his young self just because he's not covered. Have I got that right? No?

[theothercheek]

Your logic appears flawless, except for one thing: The Imam assumes that all Muslim men are rapists who will attack at the slightest provocation, even a wisp of hair peeking out from a veil or burka. One could also argue that Muslim men cannot control the urge to erupt into murderous mayhem at the slightest provocation, even a cartoon or a historical quotation in a lecture. Can you imagine belonging to a religion or a culture in which men are expected to be rapists and murderers - and Islamofascist Imams lead them to commit these heinous acts?

[Thumper1960]

If a young muslim man is walking down the street, and I, with my handloaded, hollow-point loaded .44 magnum were to come upon him and blast him to his rewards in Paradise, then I would not be guilty of any wrongdoing. Since young, male muslims are almost always the terrorist type, he deserved to be wasted before he wasted me.

The "Imam's" view of a muslim man is one of a wild, horny animal, whose lustfilled desires cannot be restrained. My view is that all muslims are savages and need to be eliminated.

Whose worldview is more twisted?

[mamelukesabre]

What? YOu mean all I gotta do to get an orgy from you is walk outside naked? I'll Do It!