Posted on 10/27/2006 6:43:57 AM PDT by jveritas
Document CMPC-2003-016112.pdf contains Iraqi Intelligence memos from December 2000 to January 2001 that talk about a coming meeting between Saddam regime and French officials. In these memos the Iraq put some talking points to discuss with the French and among them is one where they want to ask the French to provide them with information about US and Zionist Intelligence activities against Iraq. Also in the talking points the Iraqi wants to ask France to support them in the UN Security Council.
Anyone who questions why France was against the removal of Saddam regime will get a clear idea from this document about the France despicable behavior during the run to the war and after the war. France is not an ALLY.
Partial translation of document CMPC-2003-016112.pdf
The Republic of Iraq
The Presidency of the Republic
The Intelligence Service
Date: 12/12/2000
Number: M1/2/6069
Secret
To: Fourth Directorate Fourth Department
Please provide us with the subjects and clarification that you want to discuss with the French side where there will be direct discussion with them very soon.
With regards
Signature
Director of the Fourth Directorate
11/12/2000.
More translation from document CMPC-2003-016112.pdf
The Republic of Iraq
The Presidency of the Republic
The Intelligence Service
Date: 9/1/2001
Number 109
Secret
To: Fifth Directorate/4/12/3
Your announcement numbered 252 on 8/1/2001 we list below the subjects that we would like to propose to the French side and what is related to our political work and as follow:
1. Push France to take its role to influence the countries of the African Continent due to the political influence she has and to open the embassies of these countries and to widen the political and economical relations.
2. Provide Iraq with the American and Zionist Intelligence and spying activities against Iraq and that it may be under the flagship of a third country in particular the Arab or non Arab African countries and those of sub-Indian Continent.
3. The information of the French side regarding the presence in the Northern Region of those countries that are observed by our political department.
4. The information of the French side regarding the Intelligence activities inside the country by those countries that are under the observation of our political department whether it is under a legal cover (diplomatic presence) or an illegal cover.
5. Information of the French side about what they have available regarding the methods and means used by the Intelligence Services of the countries observed by our political department.
With regards
Signature
Director of the Fifth Directorate/3
9/1/2001.
Below is another partial translation of the CMPC-2003-016112.pdf
1. Take advantage of their relation with the countries of the world and provide us of what concerns Iraq in particular that they have Intelligence relations with the American, Israeli, German Federation, Syrian, and Japanese Intelligence.
Take advantage of their position UN Security Council and take care of Iraq proposals.
Publish the facts that is related to the lies of Americans against Iraq through the different media outlet and to contribute in showing the point of view of Iraq.
With regards
Director of the 7th Section.
8/1/2001.
Ping.
Yes, this is what Saddam asked for from France.
Please publish for us the file from the Iraqi intelligence directorate of what France actually GAVE him in response to this request.
Thank you for your amazing effort.
Protection, oil-for-food cover, time & help to move the WMDs. We could go on and on and on...
Hey, no one here on this forum will consider this revelation a suprise. Good work.
France had a very strong interest in its oil concessions from Iraq, the guarantee of which was the price France demanded of the US for support in the war against Iraq.
The Americans were greedy and refused to guarantee this, and so France did not play ball.
But it is a very different thing to say that France actually gave US intelligence secrets to the Iraqis.
THAT would be a very hostile thing to do.
That Saddam ASKED is not surprising.
Whether France was perfidious or not will be determined not by the request of the Iraqi, but by the response of the French government.
Politically opposing the US move on Iraq in order to protect French oil interests there iwas not perfidious. The French didn't make this a secret to the Americans.
The Americans knew the price for French support.
They refused to pay it.
And so the French stuck it to them politically.
It would have been better for everyone had the US paid it.
France had a very strong interest in its oil concessions from Iraq, the guarantee of which was the price France demanded of the US for support in the war against Iraq.
The Americans were greedy and refused to guarantee this, and so France did not play ball.
But it is a very different thing to say that France actually gave US intelligence secrets to the Iraqis.
THAT would be a very hostile thing to do.
That Saddam ASKED is not surprising.
Whether France was perfidious or not will be determined not by the request of the Iraqi, but by the response of the French government.
Politically opposing the US move on Iraq in order to protect French oil interests there iwas not perfidious. The French didn't make this a secret to the Americans.
The Americans knew the price for French support.
They refused to pay it.
And so the French stuck it to them politically.
It would have been better for everyone had the US paid it.
For Iraq to even suggest asking France to give them information about US intelligence activities against Iraq is a great indication of the strong relation that existed between the two. Saddam regime was so paranoid and if they did not know that they can trust France to give them such information they would not include it as part of the discussions.
Fricking A!
2001 Doc: Saddam Regime Wants France To Provide Info About US Intelligence Work Against Iraq
Release/Translation of Classified PreWar Docs ping. If you want to be added or removed to the ping list, please Freepmail me.
Please add the keyword prewardocs to any articles pertaining to this subject.
Operation Iraqi Freedom Documents
WOW!!! Very important article that relates exactly to this document. So there are other documents that show France gave Iraq some US Intelligence and other activities regarding Iraq.
Thank you very much.
Thank you JV. This leaves little doubt about the French support of Saddam
Special@foxnews.com (Brit Hume)
Hannity@foxnews.com
Oreilly@foxnews.com
Studiob@foxnews.com (Shep Smith)
Myword@foxnews.com (John Gibson)
Drudge@drudgereport.com
writemalkin@gmail.com
hhewitt@hughhewitt.com
rush@eibnet.com
Beltway@foxnews.com (Barnes & Kondracke)
Friends@foxnews.com
humanevents@humaneventsonline.com (Ann Coulter)
CNN@cnn.com
CNN.onair@cnn.com
Viewerservices@msnbc.com
Letters@Newsweek.com
Letters@NYT.com
Editor@USAToday.com
Webeditor@Washingtontimes.com
Letterstoed@washpost.com
http://intelligence.senate.gov/ (Senate Intelligence Committee)
No surpirse -- the damned Frogs have cornered the market on the white flag business. Watched a Dennis Miller stand-up last night and he took a couple of nice stabs at the surrender-monkeys.
Publish the facts that is related to the lies of Americans against Iraq through the different media outlet and to contribute in showing the point of view of Iraq.
There you go...and their lap dogs in the enemedia have continued to publish their lies and continue to do so. Excited to see the rest of THIS translation!
The items in that link do indeed show the transfer of information from French officials to Baghdad which should not have been transferred.
This was corrupt and evil action on the part of the current French government, going well past the natural diplomatic gamesmanship aimed at retaining French oil concessions there.
It was indeed duplicitous, and an excellent reason why Americans should be happy to see the current French government go, even though that means it will be replaced by the socialist Segolene Royal. The French Socialists did not do this to the US; the French right-wing government did.
It is very, very bad, this collusion with Saddam.
He was a butcher, very evil.
Wanting to preserve the oil concessions was in the interest of France. Once Chirac's saw that they could not protect them, and that the US would invade anyway, it was alright to diplomatically obstruct America.
But it was very wrong to give Sadam's regime intelligence.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.