Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RNC pulls controversial Ford ad
Knoxville News Sentinel ^ | 10/25/6 | REBECCA FERRAR AND TOM HUMPHREY

Posted on 10/25/2006 3:03:12 PM PDT by SmithL

The Republican National Committee has pulled from the airways a controversial ad demeaning Senate Democratic nominee Harold Ford Jr.

The RNC apparently intends to replace the ad.

The Senate Republican nominee Bob Corker had asked that the ad be taken down, calling it "tacky."

"We felt like it was tasteless and didn't reflect the kind of campaign we were running," said Corker spokesman Todd Womack.

The ad, called "Who hasn't," began running Friday.

In the ad, a man in sunglasses says of Ford, "So he took money from porn movie producers. Who hasn't?"

The ad continues with a bare-shouldered blond who says she met Ford at a Playboy party. At the end of the ad, she looks into the camera and says, with a wink, "Harold, call me."

Unhappiness with the negative ads filling the airwaves in the Senate race between Corker and Ford surfaced again at the first of two candidate meetings today with the Executive Women's Association in Knoxville.

After a luncheon speech by Corker, Baptist Health System retiree Marty Begalla told the Republican she finds the ads in both campaigns "insulting."

"I do not like what has happened by either campaign," Begalla told the former Chattanooga mayor. "They're personally demeaning and it keeps people away from discussing the issues. Surely the voters can rise above those ads. "

She said the national parties of both candidates are "dumping money on Tennessee. They think we're not smart enough to make up our own minds."

Ford speaks to the group at 5:30 this afternoon.

"It makes Willie Horton look like child's play," said John Geer, a Vanderbilt University political science professor who studies political ads. "I've never before seen an ad that brings up interracial sex — then has that porn industry comment. It's unbelievable."

Horton, who was black, was a Massachusetts murderer who was charged with rape while on a weekend furlough. Republicans used Horton in an attack ad against 1988 Democratic presidential nominee Michael Dukakis in an effort make him look soft on crime.

Ford has called on Tennessee stations to stop broadcasting that ad and another that he says is so blatantly false that it violates federal rules for commercials sponsored by non-candidate organizations and could lead to legal action against stations running it.

The ad, called "Shaky," calls Ford "slick" and "smooth" while having a record that is "a little shaky."

Among the ad's contentions are that Ford "voted to recognize gay marriage" and "wants to give the abortion pill to our schoolchildren."

In the letter from Ford's lawyer to television stations, all those claims are declared "blatantly false and misleading."

As for gay marriage, the vote cited by the RNC in documentation for the ad dealt with federal court jurisdiction over lawsuits under the "defense of marriage act" and did not involve recognizing gay marriage. In fact, the letter says, Ford voted twice in favor of a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage.

As for the abortion pill to schoolchildren, the letter says the vote cited had nothing to do with the so-called "morning after" pill that, at the time of the 2000 vote, was not available in the United States.

As in the first ad, "Shaky" also cites contributions from the porn industry. The Ford campaign has acknowledged receiving $3,600 from individuals tied to the X-rated film industry but says the money was immediately returned as soon as those ties were known.

"If this advertisement continues to air, we will pursue all legal avenues available to us," according to the letter.

Whit Adamson, executive director of the Tennessee Broadcasters Association, said the letter will trigger reviews of the ad by stations across the state and each will make its own decision. Adamson said he knew of at least one station, which he declined to name, that had indicated it would refuse to air the ad.

It has been running since Sunday statewide, said Danny Diaz, spokesman for the RNC.

Federal Election Commission figures indicate the RNC is spending about $1.5 million on the two ads. A total of almost $8 million in such "independent expenditures" have now been reported in the current Tennessee U.S. Senate campaign — apparently, a record amount for Tennessee.

The RNC defends both ads and has spurned requests to pull them — including the one from Corker.

Diaz said both ads were "air-tight, 100 percent factually accurate. We look forward to a discussion on it."

He said the first ad raises valid points and has no racial overtones.

Indeed, Diaz said Ford himself had "just lent credibility to the statements in the ad" by acknowledging Tuesday that he had attended a Playboy party at the Super Bowl in Jacksonville, Fla., in 2005.

"I was there," said the congressman at a Nashville news conference. "I like football. I like girls. I make no apologies about that."

Ford, however, criticized Corker for not doing enough to get the ad taken off the air.

"If Mr. Corker wanted these ads down, he could get them down," said Ford.

Ford also addressed the RNC ads at a ribbon-cutting for a new veterans nursing home in Knoxville on Tuesday afternoon.

"If he can't convince the Republicans to pull down this offensive, scurrilous, sleazy ad, how can we expect him to stand up for Tennesseans in the U.S. Senate?" Ford said.

The Ford campaign has pointed to close ties between Corker and the RNC, which has had one of its staffers, Camille Anderson, accompanying Corker and serving as his press secretary in recent weeks.

Diaz said, however, that the RNC keeps its "independent expenditures" wing completely separate from the main RNC, which employs himself and Anderson. Under the "fire wall" arrangement, mandated by federal laws, the RNC cannot communicate with the "independent expenditures" section — even though RNC provides the money to finance the ads.

"That's the problem with these independent expenditures," said Todd Womack, spokesman for the Corker campaign. "Apparently, Congressman Ford doesn't understand the rules, even though Democrats have the same thing."

In a statement sent to media Tuesday, the Ford campaign noted RNC Chairman Ken Mehlman said he, too, had no control over the ads during an MSNBC interview. The "Who Hasn't" ad has received considerable national attention, with reports on CNN and newspapers such as The Los Angeles Times — all focusing on perceived racial and sexual overtones.

"The Republican shell game is now plain for everyone to see," said the Ford statement. "This is the classic Washington defense — no one takes responsibility for it, but everyone gets the benefit from it. The hypocrisy is overwhelming."

Federal Election Commission figures available on Tuesday show the RNC has spent $1,519,337 on Ford attack ads. Earlier, the National Republican Senatorial Committee, or NRSC, spent $1,631,032 attacking the Democrat.

The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, meanwhile, has spent $2,024,702 on ads attacking Corker and $1,923,837 on ads promoting Ford.

Other independent expenditures listed by the FEC include:



TOPICS: Front Page News; Politics/Elections; US: Tennessee
KEYWORDS: corruptfamily; fordfraud; gutlessgop; haroldford; intimidationworked; junior; notalawyer; racists
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

1 posted on 10/25/2006 3:03:13 PM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

I'll be going now, my work is done here.


2 posted on 10/25/2006 3:05:24 PM PDT by SmithL (Where are we going? . . . . And why are we in this handbasket????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Yep, nothing like pulling an ad after it has already done its damage. Poor Harold, he thought this campaign was going to be a cornation, well, at least if you listen to him on Anus in the Morning.


3 posted on 10/25/2006 3:07:11 PM PDT by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

I am sick of political ads period. It is all mudslinging with a few baby/veteran/church puff pieces where I am. Not one damned ad saying what they are going to do. My opponent sucks and I like babies. It is insulting to our intelligence.

How about I support/oppose border fences. I support/oppose flat tax. I support/oppose something other than convincing everybody my opponent has sex with goats on a spray painted pentagram while drinking the blood of babies.


4 posted on 10/25/2006 3:08:30 PM PDT by dogbyte12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
"I've never before seen an ad that brings up interracial sex — then has that porn industry comment. It's unbelievable."

You know, only the race obsessed would notice that. I didn't even think of the racial component until some pointy headed pundit had to mention it.

If some person were going to without their vote for Ford over possible 'race mixing' then they were never going to vote for Ford to begin with due to their cracker status. Heck on good summer I'm 3 shades darker than Ford.

5 posted on 10/25/2006 3:08:59 PM PDT by TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig (Life is tough. It's even tougher when you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Wussies -- then again, the national exposure has probably maxed out the ad's penetration value (npi).


6 posted on 10/25/2006 3:10:08 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (Prayers for our patriot brother, 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub. Brian, we're all pulling for you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dogbyte12
It is insulting to our intelligence.

Yes it is, but not to theirs...that's the problem.

7 posted on 10/25/2006 3:10:23 PM PDT by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig

Funny how we conservatives who are supposed to be the racists never notice race in a thing like this. It is the Dems who have to keep that issue alive.

In any case I don't know what's tacky. It takes on Ford and his lefty record very accurately.


8 posted on 10/25/2006 3:11:46 PM PDT by TNCMAXQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig

FORD DATES WHITE WOMEN

GOOD LOOKING ONES TOO

LUCKY HIM


9 posted on 10/25/2006 3:12:05 PM PDT by misterrob (Bill Clinton, The Wizard of "Is")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: facedown

I am not opposed to "attack" ads. It's important to know what is wrong with the other guy. You attack them. I am talking about, my opponent was suspected of cheating in the third grade spelling bee kind of ads.

How about my opponent wants no restrictions on abortions, wants to raise taxes, doesn't share the values of the district instead of the crap we get on tv.


10 posted on 10/25/2006 3:12:10 PM PDT by dogbyte12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Damn. It was a funny ad.


11 posted on 10/25/2006 3:15:40 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (Karl Rove you magnificent bastard!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

How can that be? It wasn't the RNC's ad, it was an outside group. The RNC can ask that it be pulled, but they can't do it themselves.


12 posted on 10/25/2006 3:16:59 PM PDT by Not A Snowbird (Official RKBA Landscaper and Arborist, Duchess of Green Leafy Things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Not before the ad did it's intended damage! :-)

LLS


13 posted on 10/25/2006 3:17:06 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

They could have just changed that girl at the end to say something like,"meet me at the Playboy club".


14 posted on 10/25/2006 3:18:55 PM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

The good congressman was trying to persuade the bunny girl to "come to Jesus."


15 posted on 10/25/2006 3:22:30 PM PDT by stan_sipple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Harold Ford is a young Bill Clinton...he says all the right things but forgets what he said to whom. He lied about the Playboy party, he lied about being a lawyer and then lied about lieing about being a lawyer.

Simply put, he's a liar. The Senate already has plenty of them.

16 posted on 10/25/2006 3:28:08 PM PDT by blake6900 (THIS SPACE FOR RENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig
"I've never before seen an ad that brings up interracial sex — then has that porn industry comment. It's unbelievable."

What the republicans should do is remake the ad with a black woman saying it, and then put out a press release saying that it hopes this puts the democrat phony racism issue to rest.
17 posted on 10/25/2006 3:29:05 PM PDT by Hendrix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Sadly...the truth is simply not popular... I like the ad.


18 posted on 10/25/2006 3:30:29 PM PDT by cbkaty (I may not always post...but I am always here......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Dang. I thought it was hilarious. Guess Ford just doesn't have a very well developed sense of humor. He could have gotten a lot of mileage out of being good natured about it, cracked a couple of jokes and then ignored it. Instead we got to watch him clench his jaw and wring his hands at the same time, not an easy feat.


19 posted on 10/25/2006 3:30:36 PM PDT by 3AngelaD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TNCMAXQ
"Funny how we conservatives who are supposed to be the racists never notice race in a thing like this. It is the Dems who have to keep that issue alive."

That is the democrat MO. Just scream racism when they are losing the argument to end the argument and win. That is all they did here. If it would have been a black woman saying that in the ad, they would have had some other bogus racism charge about the ad (something else in the ad plays on racism).
20 posted on 10/25/2006 3:32:00 PM PDT by Hendrix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson