The Veep is right. We underestimate Hitlery at our peril.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
To: Aussie Dasher
Based on my analysis of Presidential races which indicates that the better-looking candidate has always won since the dawn of television, the GOP would have to put up a butt ugly candidate to lose to Hillary.
Okay, that was tacky.
2 posted on
10/24/2006 5:59:18 PM PDT by
Dog Gone
To: Aussie Dasher
I didn't know Cheney could play poker.
3 posted on
10/24/2006 5:59:38 PM PDT by
Extremely Extreme Extremist
(Why can't Republicans stand up to Democrats like they do to terrorists?)
To: Aussie Dasher
I could win it too, but "could" is the keyword.
4 posted on
10/24/2006 6:00:00 PM PDT by
lormand
(0 to 10,000,000 people read my posts everyday)
To: Aussie Dasher
Hillary could win in '08 if all the Republicans stayed home...
To: Aussie Dasher
I think it's more a case of "don't throw me in that briar patch."
Cheney would love to see her garner the nomination. She can't win a general election.
6 posted on
10/24/2006 6:09:06 PM PDT by
wireman
To: Aussie Dasher
DEADPAN: "Hillary could win. Oh gosh, please don't let her be the nominee. Oh, I am so scared. Yes, she could win. Oh my goodness. Hep me! Hep me! Hep me!"
*insert knashing of teeth here *
7 posted on
10/24/2006 6:11:34 PM PDT by
isthisnickcool
(The City Council of Houston Texas is made up mostly of retards.)
To: Aussie Dasher
The Veep is right. We underestimate Hitlery at our peril. Agreed. It's a shame more of us don't see this.
8 posted on
10/24/2006 6:12:30 PM PDT by
gonewt
To: Aussie Dasher
VP Cheney misses not a thing. He just redirected attention off Obama and onto Hillary, one woman even liberals dislike immensely.
Poor, poor MSM... all that Obama footage and no where to play it.... sniff.
;>
9 posted on
10/24/2006 6:13:03 PM PDT by
Alia
To: Aussie Dasher
It is a statement of the obvious. And thats all it is.
14 posted on
10/24/2006 6:34:46 PM PDT by
Phlap
(REDNECK@LIBARTS.EDU)
To: Aussie Dasher
I think she could win. I think she could steal it.
19 posted on
10/24/2006 6:47:53 PM PDT by
IncPen
(Bush Iraq Truth WMD http://freedomkeys.com/whyiraq.htm)
To: Aussie Dasher
![](http://files.blog-city.com/files/M04/59504/p/f/dead-voters-for-kerry.jpg)
Politically-active dead voters favor Democrats 98% to 2%, according to the latest polls. Among ACORN registrants, the advantage Democrats enjoy jumps even higher.
22 posted on
10/24/2006 6:57:42 PM PDT by
OESY
To: Aussie Dasher
Think of the money our government could save if Giuliani won in 2008. He'd be President and First Lady at the same time!
24 posted on
10/24/2006 7:04:01 PM PDT by
MaineVoter2002
(If you dont vote on election day, then who are you electing?)
To: Aussie Dasher
If I were a prominent Republican, I would publicly talk up Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, too.
Neither one of them, if nominated by the Democrats, stands a chance of winning the presidency.
25 posted on
10/24/2006 7:11:14 PM PDT by
PackerBoy
(Just my opinion ....)
To: Aussie Dasher
I say that as well yet I keep getting Freepers telling me "Oh there is no way she can win"... Yeah, I thought that too when she running for Senator in 2000. Then she pulled out a rabbit from her hat in the form of pardons from her personal sexual predator. Never underestimate evil.... If it puts the lives of millions in danger, the Clintons will do it. Before she set her fat arse for one second on that freggin` "listening tour", her husband had already set loose the FALN upon New York.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1709212/posts
26 posted on
10/24/2006 7:15:12 PM PDT by
Screamname
(LET`S GO TIGERS!!! LET`S GO TIGERS! LET`S GO TIGERS! LET`S GO TIGERS!!!)
To: Aussie Dasher
27 posted on
10/24/2006 7:15:37 PM PDT by
PGalt
To: Aussie Dasher
Strategery
32 posted on
10/24/2006 7:22:54 PM PDT by
Recovering_Democrat
(I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of "dependence on government"!)
To: Aussie Dasher
Geesh, she's just another stalinist lowlife power hungry control freaking old dame in a petticoat, er ah, pantsuit, with a major case of self absorbed self aggrandized delusions.
The only way she could win is to resort to vice, avarice, and treachery along with an enormous amount of outrageous lying, sliming, a lots of ash trays thrown to whomever questions her about anything.
33 posted on
10/24/2006 8:06:48 PM PDT by
harpo11
(Republicans & Conservatives Do Not Be Rope-A-Doped into Cut & Run this Nov. 7 by the old media.)
To: Aussie Dasher; All
Check out my tagline for a conservative GOP candidate that would carry the Republican base in '08. His camera appeal is far and above way better than Clinton.
Guilliani loses conservatives. He can't scarf enough votes from the middle to win. His candidacy will only revive the conservative 3rd parties and then yet another Clinton will take the WH with only 4x% of the vote. Guilliani had his chance to take on Hillary in NY. I believe that is the only place he could ever win over her anyway.
McCain is also another no go and I can't even remember seeing a positive comment made about him here on FR though I'll admit I'm not an everyday visitor.
35 posted on
10/24/2006 9:40:34 PM PDT by
kuma
(Mark Sanford '08 http://www.petitiononline.com/msan2008/petition.html)
To: Aussie Dasher
The veep wants her to run. She has more negatives than OJ, John Karr and Robert Blake combined.
36 posted on
10/24/2006 9:42:25 PM PDT by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: Aussie Dasher
Hmmmmm well wonder what it is that causes the President and the Vice President to use that word 'formidable' about Hillry?
That word means something specific, and I wish these two would be more specific.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson