Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: flixxx
Yes, fascists and other socialists do like to use their artistic works to promote their political intents.





Gibson links anti-Jewish rant with Lebanon war
Reuters by way of Ynetnews ^ | 13OCT06 | Reuters

Posted on 10/14/2006 6:50:10 PM PDT by familyop

Hollywood superstar tells Good Morning America last summer’s anti-Semitic outburst grew out of his concerns over violence raging between Israel, Hizbullah

Actor Mel Gibson says his drunken, anti-Semitic outburst at police this past summer may have stemmed in part from lingering resentment he harbored over the barrage of Jewish criticism leveled at his 2004 film “The Passion of the Christ.”

In an interview aired Friday on ABC’s “Good Morning America,” Gibson also suggested that his statement to police that “Jews are responsible for all the wars in the world” grew out of his concerns over the violence raging between Israel and Hizbullah in Lebanon at the time.

But the 50-year-old star told interviewer Diane Sawyer he was “ashamed” of the things he said during his July 28 arrest for driving while intoxicated.

Asked by Sawyer, “What are the Jews responsible for?”, Gibson replied, “They’re not blameless in the (Mideast) conflict,” then added: “Now when you’re loaded ... the balance of how you see things comes out the wrong way.”

“Let me be real clear, here. In sobriety here, in front of you, national television ... that I don’t believe that Jews are responsible for all the wars in the world,” Gibson told Sawyer. “I mean, that’s an outrageous, drunken statement.”

And he denied being influenced by the views of his father, Hutton Gibson, a Holocaust skeptic who has said publicly he doubts 6 million Jews were murdered by the Nazis.

The interview, run over two days, concluded with Gibson saying he needed to “heal myself” and to “allay the fears of others and heal them if they had any wounds from something I may have said.”

'Thin line between explanation and excuses'

Two years ago, Gibson fought off charges of anti-Semitism surrounding his film “The Passion,” a blood-soaked portrait of Jesus’ crucifixion that Jewish leaders claimed would incite hatred and even violence toward Jews.

“I was subjected to a pretty brutal public beating,” Gibson recalled. “The film came out and, you could have heard a pin drop. Not even the crickets weren’t chirping. But the other thing I never heard was one single word of apology.

“I thought I dealt with that stuff. But the human heart can bear the scars of resentment, and it will come out when you’re overwrought and you take a few drinks,” he said.

Reaction from Jewish leaders to Gibson’s TV appearance was mixed, with some saying they felt his explanations for his conduct rang hollow.

Kenneth Jacobson, deputy national director of the Anti-Defamation League, said he was heartened by Gibson’s closing statement, and particularly touched when the actor said, “The last thing I want to be is that kind of monster.”

“But I felt that when Diane Sawyer was probing about why he did it, there was a problem because there is a thin line between explanation and excuses, and some of it came close to excuses,” Jacobson said.

29 posted on 10/19/2006 4:29:53 PM PDT by familyop (Roma est perdita)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: familyop

I am pretty cynical about most of the entertainment industry...from the article:

The interview, run over two days, concluded with Gibson saying he needed to “heal myself” and to “allay the fears of others and heal them if they had any wounds from something I may have said.”

I think he only want to 'allay the fears' of his distributors for the movie, press and critics, and the public who will go to see his movie...ie he is worried about $$$$$. Again, it seems that 'Apocalypto' could be a pretty good movie with some nice themes. Like most any piece of art (book, film, poem, music) one can look for underlying themes and hidden meanings.

Maybe Gibson really is worried about Global Warming and the Bush administration ruining the U.S. and world...and those are the key themes he meant to convey in the movie...if he made a good film then it should be able to be viewed on various levels and so long as he does not beat me over the head with his opinions (as so many less talented filmmakers and writers do) then the movie still can be enjoyed and I can disagree with its meaning.

The way it looks, his film could really be a bust, however as he has alienated many on this website and certainly is not going to get an overwhelming number of viewers from New York or the Blue states to attend his movie.


39 posted on 10/19/2006 4:43:24 PM PDT by flixxx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: familyop
In an interview aired Friday on ABC’s “Good Morning America,” Gibson also suggested that his statement to police that “Jews are responsible for all the wars in the world” grew out of his concerns over the violence raging between Israel and Hizbullah in Lebanon at the time. But the 50-year-old star told interviewer Diane Sawyer he was “ashamed” of the things he said during his July 28 arrest for driving while intoxicated. Asked by Sawyer, “What are the Jews responsible for?”, Gibson replied, “They’re not blameless in the (Mideast) conflict,” then added: “Now when you’re loaded ... the balance of how you see things comes out the wrong way.”



And how exactly is Israel to blame? I'm not surprised he's an admirer of Buchanan going back to 92. Two rotten peas in a pod. Good riddance to both of them. Fools.
49 posted on 10/19/2006 5:24:04 PM PDT by macamadamia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson