Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pierrem15
I would guess Negroponte is a start.

All of the politically damaging crap that came out in 2004 was a clue.

Negroponte was appointed in 2005. As I said, I would guess Negroponte is a start.

So is the fact that the CIA failed to anticipate the NK bomb test.

You don't have a clue.

79 posted on 10/13/2006 10:21:07 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]


To: FreeReign
Negroponte was appointed in 2005.

Ummm, so what? Bush couldn't clean the agency out until Negroponte was appointed? How much time do you think it should take to clean out a national security apparatus that interferes with an election? I would say about as long as it takes to march a bunch of FBI interrogators to Langley.

Don't have any doubts, by the way, that a Dem admin wouldn't do exactly that in a heartbeat if the situation were reversed.

Regarding the NK nuke tests: we pay $20 billion a year for what? Incompetents who can't do basic political analysis?

Get a clue yourself.

82 posted on 10/13/2006 10:51:37 AM PDT by pierrem15 (Charles Martel: past and future of France)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson