Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

File and run (Plame's lawyer - phfft!)
WashTimes-Inside the Beltway ^ | 11-11-06 | John Kaslin

Posted on 10/11/2006 10:53:08 AM PDT by STARWISE

"Or maybe the case has no merit."

So suggests the latest issue of the American Lawyer, citing one theory as to why Valerie Plame of CIA-leak fame suddenly parted ways with her attorney, Proskauer Rose partner Christopher Wolf -- her next-door neighbor, no less -- shortly after her civil action was filed against senior Bush administration officials, including Vice President Dick Cheney and White House aide Karl Rove.

"The breakup was a shock," writes the magazine's Elizabeth Goldberg, given that Mr. Wolf had filed the suit only "a month earlier."

Headlined "File and run," the article quotes lawyer Victoria Toensing, a former chief counsel to the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, as saying: "I'm amazed Proskauer took the case in the first place."

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: christopherwolf; chriswolf; cialeak; nigerflap; plame; plamenamegame; proskauer; proskauerrose; selfouted; toensing; valerieplame; wilson; wolf
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last
Welcome to the Real World, Val & Joey
1 posted on 10/11/2006 10:53:09 AM PDT by STARWISE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
Gosh, this story is way to complicated for poor Chrissey Matthews.
2 posted on 10/11/2006 10:55:44 AM PDT by .cnI redruM (Appeasement never works. It only encourages new and escalating demands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; onyx; Mo1; kcvl; Txsleuth; Grampa Dave; ravingnutter; nopardons; Peach; Laverne; ...
Pa ..pa ..pa...pa... PING!
3 posted on 10/11/2006 10:56:04 AM PDT by STARWISE (They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
Proskauer is a very reputable firm that does not like media attention.

If Proskauer's other partners saw this suit as a frivolous suit that was sure to lose and embarrass the firm, they would have given Wolf his last K-1 and wished him well.

Looks like he didn't like Mrs. Plame that much.

4 posted on 10/11/2006 10:56:26 AM PDT by wideawake ("The nation which forgets its defenders will itself be forgotten." - Calvin Coolidge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM

I know ... he'll have to resort to a map legend .. poor sissyChrissy .. ;)


5 posted on 10/11/2006 10:56:47 AM PDT by STARWISE (They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE


This rates a "HAR!"


6 posted on 10/11/2006 10:58:52 AM PDT by onyx (We have two political parties: the American Party and the Anti-American Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

I understand Harold Ford's a lawyer, maybe he'll take the case.


7 posted on 10/11/2006 11:00:26 AM PDT by jazusamo (DIANA IREY for Congress, PA 12th District: Retire murtha.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Plame story is old news. Time to move on from the non-stop reporting of it. There is more important news like what Foley IM'd to college students as they made fun of him.


8 posted on 10/11/2006 11:00:41 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
He liked her as long as it helped his personal anti-Bush feelings. But when it became way to clear that Wilson was a complete liar and not only wasn't there a way to publicly extort money from somebody but that this was going to be a long, long politically motivated effort which could be ALL on the firms dime with no real chance of reward, both the attorney and the partners probably decided to save what was left of their reputation and get the hell away from Wilson/Plame.

Lots of clients lie to their attorneys and as long as the lie fits the template the attorney 'wants' to believe, they will ignore the contrary evidence up the point of a judges rebuke. Its either the sign of a bad attorney or the sign of another baby boomer Camelot-wannabe who just wanted to believe that Bush really did want to attack CIA agents because he really was truly evil just like Howard Dean said he was. Being a trial lawyer is actually a developed skill and the biggest skill is evaluating which cases you are almost certain to win and which ones are going to be messy and potentially losers. This lawyer isn't a trial lawyer. (i'm stopping before being a trial lawyer sounds like a compliment)

9 posted on 10/11/2006 11:02:35 AM PDT by bpjam (Hezbollah, Hamas, Al Qaida - The Religion of Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
Bad lawsuits, make for poor neighbors.
10 posted on 10/11/2006 11:03:18 AM PDT by FFIGHTER (Character Matters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Only a DUmmmie or Kos rube would believe that disclosing someone has clearance and/or works at CIA is a de facto civil offence.

It's not, never was, never will be. Janitors and cafeteria dishwashers at Langley have "clearance". Big whoop.

And in any case no one can discuss her former *alleged* "covert" status in a public courtroom without that status having previously been declassified.


11 posted on 10/11/2006 11:09:40 AM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Or maybe John Edwards or Cincinnati's very own Stan Chesley -- NAH -- not enough money to be made!


12 posted on 10/11/2006 11:10:31 AM PDT by Polyxene (For where God built a church, there the Devil would also build a chapel - Martin Luther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: FFIGHTER
Bad lawsuits, make for poor neighbors.

As her neighbor he might potentially be a witness. He surely must have known that Plame was not covert. There was a potential conflict of interest.

13 posted on 10/11/2006 11:10:59 AM PDT by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Plame’s lawyer decided to run
‘cause there weren’t no smoking gun
Rove beat the rap
Now the Dems have crap
Ain’t politics of personal destruction fun?


14 posted on 10/11/2006 11:11:53 AM PDT by dblshot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
Things may not be as they seem. Christopher Wolf has a specialty: Privacy, sommunications and the internet. He had a lawcase against the Repubs for publishing a picture in an ad of two gay dudes at their wedding. Wolf won.

When the Foley thing started, I wrote that I was waiting for Wolf to show up. Now, lets see if it happens and who he represents. I'm sure there will be lawsuits, books....ya know, the usual.

Hillary is all about protecting the children. She hasn't said much on Foley. Maybe it's because Bubba was 52 years old (same age as Foley) when Monica gave at the office. Of course we remember the DEMS immediately looking into the Intern Program.

Anyways, Hillary just uses her boot lickers, the ones that don't know sh** from Shinola....like Scummee and Bela Pelosi to "brainwash" the public.

15 posted on 10/11/2006 11:14:23 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Many thanks for the ping...this IS getting good. LOL


16 posted on 10/11/2006 11:17:16 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
Poor Chrissy?

He is now on to a new smear of Hastert, claiming he has aided and abetted a child molester.

He should have been fired for the Plame smear.
17 posted on 10/11/2006 11:17:41 AM PDT by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bpjam

"this was going to be a long, long politically motivated effort which could be ALL on the firms dime with no real chance of reward"

I think you have it nailed.


18 posted on 10/11/2006 11:18:27 AM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
Gosh, this story is way to complicated for poor Chrissey Matthews.

Tweety dropped this one like a very hot potato

19 posted on 10/11/2006 11:21:11 AM PDT by TC Rider (The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

"Christopher Wolf has a specialty: Privacy, sommunications and the internet."

And Mark Zaid is the primo clearance lawyer in DC, so you might expect to see him around, if there's any there, there.

But there isn't, and so we won't.


20 posted on 10/11/2006 11:22:47 AM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson