Replies

* George W. Bush adds “so help me God” to his Presidential Oath of Office. Did he know he was defying The Constitution?

Excuse me? I have JFK on tape finishing his oath of office the "so help me God". Was he defying the constitution as well?

This is religious hatred pure and simple, and the ACLU needs to visit these people! (yea, right!)

There is a terrible campaign in this country against Christians, and we better be aware of it and put it down now!

There is no separation of Church and state they way they pretend it is.

What makes the Lefts secular religion so utterly lethal is its coercion and attempt to destroy or control all independent sources of power, such as the church, the professions, private businesses, schools, and, of course, the family.

Communism has been the greatest social engineering experiment we have ever seen. It failed disastrously and in doing so it killed over 100,000,000 men, women, and children.

Yet the left marches on, following Stalin's plan to a "T".

And our college's and university's are teaching this "DEATH" by utopia to them.

There is no separation of Church and state they way they pretend it is.

Thank goodness there are sane people who know there never was, isn't now, and please God, never will be a separation to Church and State in America. We MUST not allow this to happen.

There is no separation of Church and state they way they pretend it is.

Your incorrect. There is a clear seperation of Church and State in the Constitution. What get's lost in the argument is the fact that there is no seperation of citizens rights to practice their faith and the State. What I am essentially saying is this, if the majority of the public thinks it is correct and just to have a copy of the ten commandments hanging on the wall of a courhouse, it is their right to do so. This aspect of majority rule in no way violates a minorities rights. Because, if that same minority would like to have a copy of his religions major tenats posted in the courthouse, and the majority had no objection, than everything is fine. But, if the majority objected to a monority's request to post such literature, it still neither hinders that minority's religious freedom nor does it establish a religion, in the sense that the government recognizes such an establishment. It may be rather confusing to some, but to me it's quite clear. Majority rule with minority rights. What the majority wants, as long as it in no way infringes on individuals rights, is ok.