To: bnelson44
"But I don't trust this blogger because if he were honorable, he wouldn't be so blatantly exposing a victim without concrete evidence and without at least trying to find out the other side of the story."
He left his phone number with Isstooks office, and asked that the young man call him about the story. He stated that the blog published his findings before he told them it was ok to post it.
In the case of this apparent manufactured story, this man had to have been involved in saving and then releasing these IM's just before the election. If he indeed was 18 (and he was for most of the IM's), he is no longer a victim, but he is a "participant"! To quote Mr. Spock, "THE NEEDS OF THE MANY OUT WEIGH THE NEEDS OF THE FEW"!
LLS
305 posted on
10/04/2006 6:03:37 PM PDT by
LibLieSlayer
(Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
To: LibLieSlayer
He left his phone number with Isstooks office, and asked
that the young man call him about the story. He stated that the blog published his findings before he told them it was ok to post it. Have you used blogger? I have. He would have had to publisht the page.
317 posted on
10/04/2006 6:05:53 PM PDT by
bnelson44
(Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson