Posted on 10/04/2006 6:38:58 AM PDT by pabianice
Dick Morris is a fool.
Red, then Haesert better find that reporter, to save his career.
Foley is a pious member of the Moral Majority?
He obtained good voting records from abortion and gay rights groups.
There should be a little truth-in-advertizing here. My question to Mr. Morris is how many RAT candidates is he working for this election cycle?
Gee, not one person, even the most left-wing of the democrat experts, think the democrats have any real decent chances of taking a senate majority in November. And yet you pick just enough seats in your prediction, which is probably based more on your wishful thinking than on any real evidence, that the republicans lose the majority. Yeah right.
um........
Can someone remind me about the last time Dick Morris correctly called anything, before it actually happened??
Didn't think so...
I don't believe DontBelieveAugPolls.
Can't believe you're still here. Republicans are a solid voting block and will NOT stay home because a typical Democrap dirty trick has caused a headline.
What are Democrats voting FOR? What are Republicans voting FOR? I predict the Republicans hold both houses.
LOL-I'd never heard of the guy, but then I'm from NJ-it's really hard to keep up with the corruption at home!
Napkin, he is a seminar democrat, straight from the Howard Dean Classrooms. Just like 2004.
If the Democrats can mutter threats about FCC licenses when ABC broadcasts Path to 911, what about the scandal of actually holding back information putatively bearing on the safety of minors for a year (that we know of) and dumping it in 2006 as an October Surprise!The FCC has some 'splainin' to do! I say they should be sued, and required to explain any rational reason why censorship/licensing of radio transmissions is legitimate under the First Amendment. The First Amendment says that the government can't require The New York Times to be objective - and then the FCC licensees turn around and claim that they are objective because "everyone knows" The New York Times is objective, and they mirror The New York Times.
Yes they do, specially the democrats. One of the main reasons that democrats lose election is that they underestimate the intelligence of the majority of voters. They believe that the majority of voters are very stupid and they will believe all the lies they tell them. In this case they believe that the majority of voters are going to give them control of Congress because in the minds of democrats the majority of voters are going to connect Foley to all the Republicans. As usual they are very wrong and they will pay the price for it come elections day, the real poll.
Yes, I think they do.
NEW DICK MORRIS COLUMN - DOOM!!! (Right before 2002 election--wrong again)
If there were no other issue on the table at all, the mere unacceptability of Pelosi as Speaker would get me out.
Okay, so I'm the fly in the ointment, but perhaps the Republican Party needs to lose control of the House and Senate...maybe it will give the party a real cold dose of reality that people want an Iraq policy of overwhelming force that crushes the insurgency, an immigration policy that says "no way" to any amnesty talk, a reasonable approach to stem cell research, a veto for bills that bust the budget, and a "hell no" attitude to Democratic pressure for more social programs such as No Child Left Behind, free eldercare medicines, and allowing foreign interests control certain homeland security protections.
Really? Name the 6 seats in the Senate that Republicans are going to lose.
Dickie Morris must of had some really good toe jam before he wrote this.
This is the same Dick Morris who said Bush lost on election morning 2004.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.