Replies

I agree. It is another desperate attempt by the DBM to appear to make the eight months of George W. Bush's term more responsible for 9-11 than the eight years of Bill Clinton's terms. As I have said before, Presidents at least as far back as Jimmy Carter all could have done more to address terrorism.

Although 9-11 was one of the most horrible things that has ever happened to our country, I think that fighting over whose fault it was is completely missing the most important lesson we should have learned from that attack - THESE PEOPLE WANT TO KILL US AND DESTROY OUR WAY OF LIFE. It is imperative that we succeed in Iraq because that is where it appears that the jihadists have chosen to fight the infidels (namely the US and the rest of the civilized world). We can not afford to give them the victory they so desperately seek by giving up in Iraq before the mission is complete. They know that the only way that they can win is if they can get us to quit.

As long as President Bush is the POTUS, I know that HE will not quit, but if the Dems are able, by hook or crook, to steal enough seats to take over the HOR, they can cut off the funding as they did in Vietnam. WE MUST NOT LET THAT HAPPEN! For the first time, I am not too excited about voting for my own representative, Walter B. Jones, because he has recently become so critical of the war, but he is so strong on immigration and other issues that I can not seriously consider any other possibility. I do not think that he would vote to cut off the funds for the war because he is such a strong supporter of the military. I encourage all of my fellow freepers to go out and vote to keep these imperfect Republicans in office because our country can not afford to have the Democrats in power at this critical time.