None of this was shared with us in hours of private interviews, including interviews under oath, nor do we have any paper on this, said Timothy J. Roemer, a Democratic member of the commission and a former House member from Indiana. Im deeply disturbed by this. Im furious.
Another Democratic commissioner, former Watergate prosecutor Richard Ben-Veniste, said that the staff of the Sept. 11 commission was polled in recent days on the disclosures in Mr. Woodwards book and agreed that the meeting was never mentioned to us.
This is certainly something we would have wanted to know about, he said, referring to the July 10, 2001, meeting.
******
That's not all that wasn't shared with the "commission" you MORONS and you know it since you had one of the main people responsible for 9/11 sitting on the "commission".
Barf Alert!
Hey Bob! Listen to this!
Where was the attack to be? When? I can say that there is going to be an imminent attack by al Qaeda and probably be right too.
I am so sick of the lies just to get the 'power' back...
I haven't read Woodward's book. Does he name his source for this? or give a general description like "a senior State Department official"?
All this blabber... who cares.. Clinton had 8 years to deal with terror and he didn't whatever he says with the wagging finger is a lie additionally, Berger stole documents from the National Archives that implicated the Clinton Administration could have done more about Bin Laden. So until they all come clean about what they knew and didn't know.. then we can all suppose what happened but the bottom line is we are at war with the terrorists not with each other like the Dems want us to be. America will see through it eventually.