Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sgtbono2002
It seems like most states this one likes the revenue from Gambling and Cigarette taxes ,but they are cutting their own throats by passing laws hurting business. They seem to forget that if people dont want to be around smokers they can stay out of these places.Isnt it great how do-gooders always stick their noses in where they arent wanted?

They pass helmet laws, seat belt laws, no smoking laws, laws that protect us from ourselves, when they should just
mind their own friggin business.

And the nanny do-gooders are getting worse every day.  No more live and let live.  There is always some group today that wants to conform us to their way of thinking.

Just shoot me first.  I was brought up with Freedom of Choice.

16 posted on 09/30/2006 4:58:27 AM PDT by SheLion ("If you're legal, you can fly with the Eagle!" - Michael Anthony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: SheLion
And the nanny do-gooders are getting worse every day.  No more live and let live.  There is always some group today that wants to conform us to their way of thinking.

Which is why I now support all the new sin taxes. We need new taxes on Twinkies, all fast food, pop, and especially sporting goods.  NYC is planning a ban on trans fat in food: great. 

One argument was that smokers cost society money, fine.  So do all the people who are out doing sporting events.   Runners?  They fall down.  Mountain climers? They get lost or break bones by falling down. All these sporting people are a drain on society.

We need to raise taxes on any behavior that costs society money. 

21 posted on 09/30/2006 5:11:27 AM PDT by Morgan in Denver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: SheLion; sgtbono2002

Give me a second, I need to crank up the turntable so I can put on my broken record: These legislatures doing what we don't want them to do are the same legislatures who would be voting on naturalized citizens being eligible for the presidency and other possible constitutional amendments. They cannot be counted on to prevent a President Ahnold or President Jennifer, nor prevent James and Joseph from getting hitched across the land if it comes down to an amendment. The Framers assumed responsive state legislatures, but these are anything but.


46 posted on 09/30/2006 6:19:35 AM PDT by Dahoser (God bless our troops and at home defenders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson