Posted on 09/28/2006 6:50:49 PM PDT by redstate38
;-)
I think you have to be an adolescent with a bong to appreciate its "workability."
Some sort of drugs, anyway. I mean, I know he's capable of Sister Souljah moments, but that rant went on past "Sister Souljah moment" right into "Captain Queeg moment".
Therefore, Clinton would never have have lifted a finger. Oh, wait - he never DID lift a finger - except to wag it at US...
I believe "Roger" refers to Clinton's esteemed brother.
Clinton better take his meds. He seems on the verge of a breakdown.
The most astonishing part of Slick's diatribe is when he accused Chris Wallace of being a right-wing apologist!
Chris Wallace, who is about as far right as the late unlamented Peter Jennings!
Great analysis. Thanks!
This just in from the blogosphere:
Another expose of our pal's the Klowntons over at silentrunning.tv--Here’s a reason that Willy and Hilly might be a lot more comfortable trying to very publicly put lipstick on the pig otherwise known as the Clinton legacy of buffoonery in the war on terror - to mis-direct people from taking too close a look at their latest financial shennanigans. "The relationship between the Clintons and the emir has long been too close to avoid scrutiny. Something is driving up Bill and Hillary’s net worth pretty dramatically. In 2003, Sen. Clinton disclosed assets of at least $352,000 but less than $3.8 million. By 2005, she was declaring assets in the $10 million to $50 million range."
LostDog has been put to sleep...
LOL, that's a keeper, Rich!
>> The liberals LOVE their Bullies...it's the ONLY thing that keeps them in the game.
Agreed. Let's look at some liberal heroes:
Bill Clinton
Hillary Clinton
Rahm Emanuel
Harry Reid
Nancy Pelosi
Al Franken
Randi Rhodes
Bill Maher
Keith Olbermann
Jon Stewart
Molly Ivins
Maureen Dowd
There are a ton more but these are the names of the moment.
In almost all cases, mockery, a disrespectful tone, an almost-continuous insulting of the opposition (whoever they may be athat moment) all characterize these people. They exhibit a sociopathic response to any challenge or suggestion that they may not be right 100% of the time and resort to raising the volume, pointing a finger up or at the reporter/opponent/target, etc. In short, they result to bullying tactics on a verbal and psychological level. It's considered acceptable because it's not physical violence but like the screeching harpies at your local college campus the effect is the same.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.