To: AmericanInTokyo
Seems to me that heaving the federal responsibility onto local police is counterproductive and sets a dangerous precedent.
The goal is admirable, but the means is questionable.
To: LurkedLongEnough
If the feds won't do it, we in the States are reserved those rights. Shut off the employer magnet (through sanctions) such as in the Herndon new regs/enforcement and they will self deport in massive numbers.
I predict that little town will clean up immensely. Crime, grafitti, loitering, gangs, communicable diseases, drunk driving, welfare dollars via taxes, translations costs in the courts, etc. are all going to come down dramatically.
4 posted on
09/28/2006 6:43:17 AM PDT by
AmericanInTokyo
(..is an American allright, but is not in Japan, folks. Thanks for letting me keep the moniker.)
To: LurkedLongEnough
"Seems to me that heaving the federal responsibility onto local police is counterproductive and sets a dangerous precedent."
Please explain. The Feds seem happy enough to look the other way once illegals get into the interior of the country. Whom better than the local police... who KNOW the neighborhoods...and the people who live in them, should actually do their sworn duty and uphold the law. I'd rather have local police handle the situation then some FedGov -Rambo types flown in for the special occasion....
5 posted on
09/28/2006 7:19:24 AM PDT by
taxed2death
(A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
To: LurkedLongEnough
heaving the federal responsibility onto local police is counterproductive and sets a dangerous precedent. What you are apparently not aware of is that many local LE are already deputized as federal agents, a bi-product of the war on drugs.
13 posted on
09/28/2006 2:17:37 PM PDT by
at bay
("We actually did an evil....." Eric Schmidt, CEO Google)
To: LurkedLongEnough
heaving the federal responsibility onto local police is counterproductive and sets a dangerous precedent. What you are apparently not aware of is that many local LE are already deputized as federal agents, a bi-product of the war on drugs.
14 posted on
09/28/2006 2:18:00 PM PDT by
at bay
("We actually did an evil....." Eric Schmidt, CEO Google)
To: LurkedLongEnough
Are you suggesting we need many more federal officers, when the local police run into these criminals all day long?
To: LurkedLongEnough
Seems to me that heaving the federal responsibility onto the local police is counter productive and sets a dangerous precedent. On the surface it looks that way but the truth is the Feds have had plenty of time to solve this problem and they keep buck passing or ignoring it. I don't know which is worse.
In every town, city, county in the US the decision is coming for local governing bodies about whether or not to make their cities safe again for US citizens.
Many cities are opting to train their police force to contend with whatever the problem, sensing the feds lack the will, desire much less the funding.
17 posted on
09/28/2006 5:48:51 PM PDT by
rodguy911
(Support The New media, Ticket the Drive-bys, --America-The land of the Free because of the Brave-)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson