Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

1998 Memo Cited Suspected Hijack Plot by Bin Laden [CLINTON FAILURE FLASHBACK!!]
Washington Post ^ | Sunday, July 18, 2004 | Susan Schmidt

Posted on 09/27/2006 11:49:52 AM PDT by Enchante

A secret intelligence document prepared for President Bill Clinton in December 1998 reported on a suspected plot by Osama bin Laden to hijack a U.S. airliner in an effort to force the United States to release imprisoned conspirators in the 1993 World Trade Center attacks.

The one-page declassified version of the President's Daily Brief dated Dec. 4, 1998, contains chilling information -- gleaned by the CIA from several sources -- indicating that al Qaeda was working with U.S.-based operatives of its deadly ally, the Egyptian group Gama at al-Islamiyya, in the purported hijacking plot.

The PDB shows that the intelligence community and the White House had been aware of al Qaeda's interest in hijacking U.S. airliners long before the attacks on Sept. 11, 2001. On the day the PDB was prepared, then-CIA Director George J. Tenet said in a memo to the intelligence community that "we are at war" and that no resources should be spared to defeat the terrorists.

.....

The 1998 document is "the most important PDB about hijacking published before 9/11," Zelikow said. The Aug. 6, 2001, PDB prepared for President Bush mentioned 1998 intelligence concerning a plot by bin Laden "to hijack a U.S. aircraft to gain the release of 'Blind Sheik' Omar Abdel Rahman and other U.S.-held extremists."

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: algore; bush; clinton; democrats; foxnews; gore; hillary; lyinghillary; waronterror; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last
Well lookee here...... WaPo buried this on page A17 back in 2004, but at least they did print it (probably more than most of the DBM ever did). Highly relevant to current Clinton meltdown over FoxNews, etc. and Hillary's ridiculous assertion that the Clintonistas would have reacted decisively to the Aug. 2001 PDB that President Bush received.
1 posted on 09/27/2006 11:49:54 AM PDT by Enchante
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Enchante

Clinton destroyed national security by dissing the CIA and appeasing the Commmies and Muslim Terror groups.

Ops4


2 posted on 09/27/2006 11:51:02 AM PDT by OPS4 (Ops4 God Bless America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

ping


3 posted on 09/27/2006 11:52:39 AM PDT by RDTF ("We love death. The US loves life. That is the big difference between us two.” Osama Bin laden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RDTF

thx :)


4 posted on 09/27/2006 11:53:44 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

But the 9/11 commission's executive director (I'm sure a Dem) did say the Clinton administration did have an "energetic response" to the threat.


5 posted on 09/27/2006 11:54:33 AM PDT by threeleftsmakearight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

Nice catch. Certainly torpedoes Hitlery's assertions from yesterday.


6 posted on 09/27/2006 11:54:52 AM PDT by SueRae
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

BTTT


7 posted on 09/27/2006 11:55:05 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fedora; Howlin; ravingnutter; piasa; Peach; Grampa Dave; pinz-n-needlez; doug from upland; ...

Major Clinton lying hypocrisy ping!!

Please help to research this subject and spread the info to the media.

Hillary should be devoid of all credibility by now.....

This directly contradicts Hillary's preposterous assertion that the Aug. 2001 PDB represented some great red flag that would have produced decisive action by the Clintonistas.

Look at the further indications of great Al Qaeda concern for terrorist prisoners associated with the 1993 WTC bombing, etc.


8 posted on 09/27/2006 11:55:34 AM PDT by Enchante (There are 3 kinds of lies: Lies, Damned Lies, and the Drive-By Media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: threeleftsmakearight

They held a meeting?


9 posted on 09/27/2006 11:56:18 AM PDT by Straight Vermonter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: OPS4

I get the feeling that Klinton also filled the CIA and FBI with corrupt liberals to purposely weaken them. I find it interesting how often the CIA releases reports "proving" that the war on terrorism is ineffective, is causing more terrorism, is destroying America's credibility in the world, and that the only WMDs left in Iraq are a handful of obsolete and ineffective shells from the '80s.


10 posted on 09/27/2006 11:58:02 AM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity ("A litany of complaints is not a plan." - GW Bush, referring to DNC's lack of a platform on ANYTHING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SueRae

the fact that Bin ladin was around to plan 9-11 proves that hillary was lying yesterday. Bubba had 10 chances to nail bin laidn and he missed them all, ironically he never missed a chance at nailing monica.


11 posted on 09/27/2006 11:58:05 AM PDT by edzo4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter

Oh, I'm sure this guy's idea of energetic is something along those lines.
But if you trot this article out to your lefty relatives, they'll point to that one characterization as proof that Clinton did take more seriously the terror threat than Bush.


12 posted on 09/27/2006 11:58:23 AM PDT by threeleftsmakearight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

I knew I had seen this posted somewhere on the Internet recently. Interesting that this story was written by Susan Schmidt, whom the Clintons and their sycophants hated because she reported so much dirt out of the Clinton White House and did not drink the Al Gore Koolaid in 2000.


13 posted on 09/27/2006 11:59:03 AM PDT by Dems_R_Losers (Vote as if your life depends on it -- because it does!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

1998. Was Usef in jail in the US at that time? The Plilipino cops surely had his notes and laptop by then.

This PDD means that we (the USA) had been warned at least twice.


14 posted on 09/27/2006 11:59:27 AM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: Enchante

9/11 Timeline: "Intelligence Warnings"

1998: Indonesia Gives US Warning of 9/11 Attack?

Hendropriyono, the Indonesian chief of intelligence, will later claim that, “[we] had intelligence predicting the September 11 attacks three years before it happened but nobody believed us.” He says Indonesian intelligence agents identify bin Laden as the leader of the group plotting the attack and that the US disregards the warning, but otherwise offers no additional details. The Associated Press notes, “Indonesia’s intelligence services are not renowned for their accuracy.” [Associated Press, 7/9/2003]

No response from Clinton

1999: British Intelligence Warns al-Qaeda Plans to Use Aircraft, Possibly as Flying Bombs

MI6, the British intelligence agency, gives a secret report to liaison staff at the US embassy in London. The reports states that al-Qaeda has plans to use “commercial aircraft” in “unconventional ways,” “possibly as flying bombs.” [Sunday Times (London), 6/9/2002]

No response from Clinton

March 1999: Germany Provides CIA Hijacker’s Name and Telephone Number

German intelligence gives the CIA the first name of hijacker Marwan Alshehhi and his telephone number in the United Arab Emirates. The Germans learned the information from surveillance of suspected Islamic militants. They tell the CIA that Alshehhi has been in contact with suspected al-Qaeda members Mohammed Haydar Zammar and Mamoun Darkazanli. He is described as a United Arab Emirates student who has spent some time studying in Germany. [US Congress, 7/24/2003; Deutsche Presse-Agentur (Hamburg), 8/13/2003; New York Times, 2/24/2004] The Germans consider this information “particularly valuable” and ask the CIA to track Alshehhi, but the CIA never responds until after the 9/11 attacks. The CIA decides at the time that this “Marwan” is probably an associate of bin Laden but never track him down. It is not clear why the CIA fails to act, or if they learn his last name before 9/11. [New York Times, 2/24/2004] The Germans monitor other calls between Alshehhi and Zammar, but it isn’t clear if the CIA is also told of these or not (see September 21, 1999).

No response from Clinton

August 12, 2000: Italian Intelligence Wiretap of al-Qaeda Cell Reveals Massive Aircraft-based Strike

Italian intelligence successfully wiretap the al-Qaeda cell in Milan, Italy from late 1999 until the summer of 2001. [Boston Globe, 8/4/2002] In a wiretapped conversation from this day, suspected Yemeni Abdulsalam Ali Abdulrahman tells wanted Egyptian Mahmoud Es Sayed about a massive strike against the enemies of Islam involving aircraft and the sky, a blow that “will be written about in all the newspapers of the world. This will be one of those strikes that will never be forgotten. ... This is a terrifying thing. This is a thing that will spread from south to north, from east to west: The person who came up with this program is a madman from a madhouse, a madman but a genius.” In another conversation, Abdulrahman tells Es Sayed: “I’m studying airplanes. I hope, God willing, that I can bring you a window or a piece of an airplane the next time we see each other.” The comment is followed by laughter. Beginning in October 2000, FBI experts will help Italian police analyze the intercepts and warnings. Neither Italy nor the FBI will understand their meaning until after 9/11. [Boston Globe, 8/4/2002]

No response from Clinton


16 posted on 09/27/2006 12:00:09 PM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

Thanks.


17 posted on 09/27/2006 12:00:19 PM PDT by shield (A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand; but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

I wonder...does that qualify as far as Hillary is concerned as a memo detailing a strike within the United States...like the Aug 6 memo that shes' grabbed onto so fiercely lately?
I wonder which brave reporter will be the first and last to ask Mrs. cold blood about the comparisons on content and whether they are pretty much the same.


18 posted on 09/27/2006 12:02:03 PM PDT by WoodstockCat (General Honore: "The storm gets a vote... We're not stuck on stupid.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Look here.


19 posted on 09/27/2006 12:02:14 PM PDT by billhilly (DU Funnies pingee # 911)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

Makes one rethink TWA 800 and OKC doesn't it?


20 posted on 09/27/2006 12:03:22 PM PDT by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson