Skip to comments.
CONDI VS. BUBBA . . .(Berger stolen papers revealed?)
NY Post ^
| 9/26/06
| Editorial
Posted on 09/26/2006 6:08:31 AM PDT by teddyballgame
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-168 next last
To: Mo1
None of this is surprising...especially the part about Condi being more "honest".
21
posted on
09/26/2006 6:28:45 AM PDT
by
Txsleuth
(,((((((((ISRAEL)))))) Pray for the release of the Israelis.)
To: teddyballgame
NOTHING in this editorial will ever be repeated on The Sunday Shows, any Evening Newscast or any mainstream newspaper. Clinton's screw ups NEVER HAPPENED.
22
posted on
09/26/2006 6:30:09 AM PDT
by
GianniV
To: stm
"'Why did you fire Dick Clarke,".. Because he was spending to much time trying to resurrect his American Bandstand show?
To: jwalsh07
It goes further back than 25 years. Specifically Jimmy Carter.
24
posted on
09/26/2006 6:31:59 AM PDT
by
DB
(©)
To: Eagles Talon IV
Because he was spending to much time trying to resurrect his American Bandstand show? Naww, it was a hair thing. Duby and Cheney were jealous of his hair.
25
posted on
09/26/2006 6:32:17 AM PDT
by
GaltMeister
(“All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.”)
To: Quilla
The most amazing thing from that article was that Berger admitted to destroying the papers in preparation for the testimony.
After his court appearance, Berger told reporters that he "exercised poor judgement" and "deeply regretted it." He said his motivation was to help himself and others prepare for their appearance before the commission probing the events surrounding the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.
26
posted on
09/26/2006 6:33:02 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(If stupidity got us into this mess, then why can't it get us out?)
Comment #27 Removed by Moderator
To: ravingnutter
So there was no connection between Saddam and Usama, right. If I was thinking of moving in with my daughter, I'd probably tell her first.
28
posted on
09/26/2006 6:35:34 AM PDT
by
Sacajaweau
(God Bless Our Troops!!)
To: GianniV
Before the advent of the "new" media that would have been the case. No longer.
To: rodguy911
I have delicious visions of Condi stomping on slick willie's instep with her high heeled boot.
30
posted on
09/26/2006 6:36:10 AM PDT
by
OldFriend
(I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag.....and My Heart to the Soldier Who Protects It.)
To: ravingnutter
Thanks for that poignant reminder. I still find it amazing that the MSM/DBM have all but ignored this story & still quote Sandy Berger as if his opinion is relevant about anything.
31
posted on
09/26/2006 6:36:16 AM PDT
by
demkicker
(democrats, terrorists, Powell, McCain, Graham & Collins are intimate bedfellows)
To: stevestras
Just think of all the 'stans' that cooperated with our military. Using their bases, allowing us to flyover their territory, to say nothing of Mushareff openly acting on our behalf at great GREAT risk to himself and his rule.
Whatever Pakistan is doing behind the scenes, we could never have accomplished so much without Pakistan.
32
posted on
09/26/2006 6:38:09 AM PDT
by
OldFriend
(I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag.....and My Heart to the Soldier Who Protects It.)
To: radar101
No need for papers like that to be stolen. It was all public information.
I suspect that it was the analysis of our weakness and inaction in the fact of all the terror attacks that happened before 9/11.
33
posted on
09/26/2006 6:39:05 AM PDT
by
OldFriend
(I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag.....and My Heart to the Soldier Who Protects It.)
To: teddyballgame
Too bad Larry Kudlow has jumped the shark. He's having begala and snakehead on his show today.
34
posted on
09/26/2006 6:40:24 AM PDT
by
OldFriend
(I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag.....and My Heart to the Soldier Who Protects It.)
To: Mo1
35
posted on
09/26/2006 6:40:43 AM PDT
by
tiredoflaundry
( The kinder we are to terrorists, the harsher we are to their potential victims.)
To: teddyballgame
Clinton effectively slept through it all - and now he's trying to rewrite history. Bullseye! The more this is discussed, the more exposed he becomes. Shrillary must be one pissed off wench this week.
36
posted on
09/26/2006 6:42:09 AM PDT
by
capydick
(Not to know is bad; not to wish to know is worse.)
Comment #37 Removed by Moderator
To: ravingnutter
Thanks for the detailed response. I thought the papers had something to do with the terror plot for Millenium project. I hadn't realized that the papers focused that much on the glaring defficiencies of the Clinton Admin.
Has Dick Clark ever gone on record about Berger's stolen documents?
38
posted on
09/26/2006 6:42:26 AM PDT
by
teddyballgame
(red man in a blue state)
To: NRA1995
Clinton can't take difficult hardball questions. The world was his oyster when he and his "staff" could orchestrate everything and eliminate anyone who crossed them with threats and/or arrest. He isn't used to being crossed. He looked like he wanted to physically attack Wallace, so perhaps he needs a big old can of Ignore the Clintons opened on him and to be relegated to the back burner of the attention stove - along with Hillary. If his Presidency was a disASSter, hers would be a catASStrophe, probably starting right away with the massive voter fraud it would take to elect her.
39
posted on
09/26/2006 6:42:37 AM PDT
by
Twinkie
(Faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the Word of God.)
To: teddyballgame
Never underestimate the Clinton spin team and the MSM's tendency to buy into it. (Clinton spin = outright lies)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-168 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson