Liberal lunacy exposed. Maybe Chavez had Chomsky in Howie Carr's death pool (local reference).
To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
Idiotic political theorist/Brilliant linguist. Have to take the good with the bad, I guess.
2 posted on
09/22/2006 8:27:56 PM PDT by
Zeroisanumber
(Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
Why couldn't Hugo Chavez hold up one of my books?Send him one, a$$hole. He probably will.
3 posted on
09/22/2006 8:28:34 PM PDT by
Right Wing Assault
("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
Chomsky's been dead for a long time now.
4 posted on
09/22/2006 8:31:13 PM PDT by
bnelson44
(Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
5 posted on
09/22/2006 8:33:03 PM PDT by
Right Wing Assault
("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
MIT Profs gone bad.
6 posted on
09/22/2006 8:33:22 PM PDT by
Diogenesis
(Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
That's a shame ~ that he's not taking calls that is.
7 posted on
09/22/2006 8:35:33 PM PDT by
muawiyah
To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
Okay. I admit I'm not the brightest, nor the cleverest, nor the most up to speed on things.
But can someone please explain to me why A FREAKING LINQUIST is quoted, referenced or otherwise paid attention to at all? As if his political opinions matter.
He's a linguist, for God's sake.
8 posted on
09/22/2006 8:36:15 PM PDT by
Lizavetta
To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
Oh Normmmmm, Hugo the blinking idiot and devoted fan on line six.
12 posted on
09/22/2006 8:39:35 PM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking it's heritage.)
To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
Maybe they should read "Do What I Say - Not What I Do." It exposes Chomski for the fraud that he is.
To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
Chomsky is nothing without Kissinger or Vietnam...I think he devotes the first 100 pages of every book on them.
16 posted on
09/22/2006 8:41:26 PM PDT by
endthematrix
(“Anyone who describes Islam as a religion as intolerant encourages violence.”)
To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
"Why couldn't Hugo Chavez hold up one of my books?" Ummmm....because your books suck even worse than Chomsky's?
23 posted on
09/22/2006 8:52:44 PM PDT by
uglybiker
(Don't look at me. I didn't make you stupid.)
To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
gosh, it seems quite simple to me -- hugo chavez will be remembered as the a*shole who actually took noam chomsky seriously, while noam chomsky will be remembered as the a*shole who was only taken seriously by
intellectually challenged communist nutjobs like hugo chavez.
ah, noam chomsky - trotskyite defender of khmer rouge, pol pot and cambodian genocide... to be defended along with the usual suspects Mao, Stalin, and any person or thing that advances the New Socialist World Order... ah, noam chomsky, the national poster boy for why academic tenure needs to be abolished...
24 posted on
09/22/2006 8:55:40 PM PDT by
chilepepper
(The map is not the territory -- Alfred Korzybski)
To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
What I don't understand is why a prestigious military academy like West Point would invite Chomsky as a key note speaker.
To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
I have to laugh at the thought of
commie/socialist/marxists wanting
to "$ell more book$" in this
Capitalist society. The irony seems
to be completely lost on them. ;o)
46 posted on
09/23/2006 11:58:49 AM PDT by
Liberty Valance
(Keep a simple manner for a happy life)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson