Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

At Least 25 Die In German Train Crash
CBS ^ | 09/22/06

Posted on 09/22/2006 4:34:23 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

At Least 25 Die In German Train Crash

LATHEN, Germany, Sept. 22, 2006

(AP) A high-tech train traveling at 125 mph crashed in northwestern Germany on Friday, killing at least 25 people in the first fatal wreck involving the magnetic levitation system.

The train, which runs primarily as a demonstration by its manufacturer, was carrying at least 29 people when it struck a maintenance vehicle carrying two workers on the elevated track. Mangled wreckage hung from the 13-foot-high track, with seats and other debris strewn below.

Police spokesman Martin Ratermann said the death toll rose to 25 after more searching was done in and around the train, which crashed about a half-mile from the station at the village Melstrup. Officials also reported 10 people were injured.

Magnetic-levitation trains use powerful magnets to float the trains just above the elevated track, allowing them to glide along without friction.

The 9:30 a.m. collision on a 20-mile track between Doerpen and Lathen near the Dutch border, shattered the front of the train, which came to rest still on its elevated guideway. Rescuers had to use fire ladders and cranes to reach the wreck.

The maintenance car was regularly used to check and clear the tracks of branches and other debris.

Rudolf Schwarz, a spokesman for IABG, which oversees the track, said the accident was the result of human error.

"At this time, the accident was not caused by a technical failure. It is the result of human error," he said.

The Transrapid train is made by Transrapid International, a joint company of Siemens AG and ThyssenKrupp AG. The track is operated by Munich-based IABG mostly as an exhibition aimed at showing off Germany's advanced "maglev" technology, which has been led by ThyssenKrupp AG and Siemens AG.

Aboard the train were Transrapid employees, workers from a home nursing care company and people from local utility RWE. Klaus Schultebraucks, a spokesman for utility RWE Westfalen, confirmed several of the company's workers were aboard but he did not know how many nor if they survived.

"We only know a group of our employees were riding on the train," he said. "We don't have more information."

Schwarz said IABG was still getting the details of the accident.

"We're trying to get as many details as we can," he said, adding that the train, which can reach speeds of as much as 450 kph, or 270 mph, was going about 200 kph.

Tourists can sometimes ride the train for fun, but otherwise it is primarily used for selling Germany's maglev technology.

Kevin Coates, a former spokesman for Transrapid, said it was the first time that he was aware of a crash of a magnetic-levitation train.

"I have to believe that this is not a malfunction of the technology but a communications breakdown" between the operators and the maintenance personnel, he told the AP by telephone from Maryland, in the United States.

This was Germany's worst rail disaster since 1998, when 101 people died after an InterCityExpress derailed and smashed into a bridge near the northern town of Eschede in what remains the country's deadliest train crash.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel left a conference in Berlin and arrived near the scene by helicopter.

Wearing black, she said her thoughts were with the victims. "I want to show that I am with them," she said.

She declined to talk about what effect the accident would have on Germany's maglev technology industry and whether it would affect plans for future lines.

"Today we are in mourning," she said. In May, Merkel traveled to China to tout economic ties with the country, and went for a ride on the maglev train that links Shanghai's Pudong International Airport with the city's financial district. The link covers 19 miles at up to 270 mph, and was built with ThyssenKrupp and Siemen's help.

The accident is another blow to hopes for the magnetic-levitation technology after a fire on the train in Shanghai last month.

The fire broke out in an electrical storage compartment aboard the maglev train as it was headed toward the city's international airport Aug. 11, generating large amounts of smoke but causing no injuries.

The technology has been around for years but so far has not caught on as conventional train networks have expanded steadily. Concerns include the amount of electricity the trains use at high speed and the precision with which the tracks must be built.

Officials are studying the possibility of a line between Munich and the city's airport.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 3rdtrainwrecktoday; maglev; magnet; magneticlevitation; magnets; rail; railroad; railway; train; traincrash

1 posted on 09/22/2006 4:34:23 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

A 75 mph airplane crash is considered not survivable. Of course the race cars crash at higher speed with better survivability, but the train passengers were probably not strapped in harness and wearing nomex and helmets.


2 posted on 09/22/2006 4:38:29 PM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
The maintenance car was regularly used to check and clear the tracks of branches and other debris.

What checks the tracks to be sure they are clear of maintenance cars?

3 posted on 09/22/2006 4:41:57 PM PDT by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

Those trains only travel about 1/2" above the track. This one was a collision, but I'm surprised that there haven't been more accidents.


4 posted on 09/22/2006 4:44:26 PM PDT by Jaysun (Idiot Muslims. They're just dying to have sex orgies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Blue Jays
Hi All-

The technology behind this maglev train is fascinating. So sorry to hear about those unfortunate people killed in the accident. Thankfully it was due to simple human error rather than the train simply being genuinely unsafe. I imagine if they saw the maintenance vehicle on the track the speeding maglev could have been halted very quickly.

~ Blue Jays ~

5 posted on 09/22/2006 4:47:57 PM PDT by Blue Jays (Rock Hard, Ride Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
All that wiz bang technology and all these people are killed for the same general reason that took Casey Jones' lift 120 years ago. Sad and Humbling. Prayers for the families.
6 posted on 09/22/2006 4:49:30 PM PDT by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

So much for running the trains on time.

Sad, human error strikes again.


7 posted on 09/22/2006 4:51:31 PM PDT by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimSEA

My guess is that once maglev trains come into widespread use we will love their quieter operation and minimal impact upon the environment. Safety rules will need to be very strict given the higher speeds. Very sad news, indeed.


8 posted on 09/22/2006 4:57:33 PM PDT by Blue Jays (Rock Hard, Ride Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Blue Jays

And while we're about it, a salute to the memory of the great Eric Laithwaite, the British inventor who first devised the maglev concept - sadly a prophet without honour in his own country till after his death.


9 posted on 09/23/2006 1:12:26 AM PDT by Winniesboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: operation clinton cleanup
What checks the tracks to be sure they are clear of maintenance cars?

More maintenance cars.

It's maintenance cars, all the way down.

10 posted on 09/23/2006 4:28:02 AM PDT by Erasmus (I invited Benoit Mandelbrot to the Shoreline Grill, but he never got there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jaysun

Heard some discussion last night about how as technology advances the margin for error is reduced. Speeds are higher, timing is closer, reliance is assumed to be 100%. We might look at the Space Shuttle where the margin for error is very tight, or we might look at the municipal power grid where most homes have developed a dependence on the power being there always. Even the bomb in Sadr City wouldn't have been nearly so destructive if the residents weren't gathered around the fuel truck getting oil for their home stoves--wouldn't have happened if they were still burning camel dung or whatever they used to use.


11 posted on 09/23/2006 8:39:28 AM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson