[2nd amendment mama]

This is in response to this thread:

Bradys Send Letter to Illinois Gubernatorial Candidate Topinka

[2nd amendment mama]

Ping

[Condor51]

The ironic thing is that Judus Barr Too-pink-for-me is a gun grabber herself. She's just moving 'right' now (verbally) to try to fool the electorate here.

But WE ain't buying it. She's just as bad as the current moron gov of ours.

[Fiddlstix]

......the definition is so vague that a rolling pin could be considered an assault weapon......

Damn it Judy! IF a rolling pin is used in an assault then it IS an "assault weapon"!
So is a pipe or a baseball bat, etc,etc!

Get A Life!

IT'S NOT ABOUT THE WEAPON USED! IT'S ABOUT ASSAULT!!!
THE CRIME IS ASSAULT!!!
Stupid!!!

[epow]

One thing is clear from the rush of Mr. and Mrs. Brady to condemn a politician for noticing the shortcomings in a proposed definition that could rob citizens of Constitutionally guaranteed rights.

I haven't heard much out of Sarah for quite some time. I thought perhaps she had a change of heart after her brush with death from cancer, and maybe decided not to continue her cruel practice of dragging her poor disabled husband around the country and displaying him in public venues as though he was a stuffed and mounted victim of some dreaded disease. Between her and former Senator Max Cleland they're giving disabled folks a very bad name.

I can feel sorry for both Jim Brady and Max Cleland, I don't enjoy seeing anyone suffering their way through life as paraplegics the way they are even though I'm thoroughly disgusted by their anti-American political activities. But the 2nd Amendment is not responsible for Cleland carelessly dropping a live grenade on his feet, nor for a deranged young man trying to impress a movie star by shooting the President with a gun which he could easily have bought illegally on the streets of the D.C. even if all guns had been banned everywhere in the nation at the time.

People who want guns to use in crime don't care how many antigun laws are enacted in Illinois. They will always have guns precisely because they're criminals, and criminals are by definition people who don't obey laws that interfere with satisfying their desire for money, revenge, sex, thrills, whatever. According to what I read, there is more of what the MSM calls "gun crime" in the maniacally hoplophobic UK now than before all handguns were totally banned there 9 years ago. Yeah, that gun ban thingy is working out just ducky over there isn't it Limeys? I tolljaso, gun bans don't work as advertised, never have, never will.