Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NYPD BOOM: Bomb Shock
New York Post ^ | 9/13/06 | Geoff Earle

Posted on 09/13/2006 7:12:08 PM PDT by World_Events

September 13, 2006 -- Two undercover NYPD cops in a sting operation used $7,000 and the Internet to build a truck bomb big enough to blow up a skyscraper, officials revealed yesterday. In what was dubbed "Operation Kaboom," every purchase the cops made was legal - and aroused little suspicion - even driving their simulated truck bomb throughout the city.

Although the two cops had no specialized knowledge of bomb-making, they were able manufacture an explosive more powerful than the one used in the 1993 World Trade Center attack.

"We did it with no difficulty whatsoever," said James Falkenrath, the NYPD's top anti-terror cop, who testified at a congressional hearing yesterday and disclosed the making of the bomb.

When the operation was complete, the officers drove the simulated bomb around the city's bridges and tunnels, sources said. They were not detected and the bomb was not functional.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: ammoniumnitrate; anfo; donutwatch; misleadingarticle; misleadingexcerpt; seepost3; truckbomb

1 posted on 09/13/2006 7:12:09 PM PDT by World_Events
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: World_Events

Who was supposed to get suspicious?


2 posted on 09/13/2006 7:16:06 PM PDT by cripplecreek (If stupidity got us into this mess, then why can't it get us out?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: World_Events

I read the full article, and the ammonium nitrate distributor did in fact get suspicious about the purchase the undercover cops made, and contacted the ATF. The "plot" was able to progress past that point because the NYPD told the ATF that it was an undercover op and basically called them off.


3 posted on 09/13/2006 7:18:15 PM PDT by Ex-Dem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: World_Events
We simply cannot make everything that could possibly be used maliciously illegal or regulated and remain a free society.
4 posted on 09/13/2006 7:21:48 PM PDT by kerryusama04 (Isa 8:20, Eze 22:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: World_Events

$7000 worth of Ammonium Nitrate will not bring down a skyscraper. Shameless fear mongering.


5 posted on 09/13/2006 7:24:43 PM PDT by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dljordan
$7000 worth of Ammonium Nitrate will not bring down a skyscraper. Shameless fear mongering.

But $7000 worth of political donations close to the elections may bring down the government according to McLame /FindGold!

6 posted on 09/13/2006 7:36:06 PM PDT by Don Corleone (Leave the gun..take the cannoli)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dljordan

At twelve cents a pound for bulk delivered ANFO, that's 58,000 pounds worth, very roughly. I could pop about 10,000 tons of quarry rock with that. Sure it's more efficient in a 6" blast hole, but I would not want a family member in the building when it went off.


7 posted on 09/13/2006 7:44:31 PM PDT by Toby06
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kerryusama04
We simply cannot make everything that could possibly be used maliciously illegal or regulated and remain a free society.

Exactly. Well said.

8 posted on 09/13/2006 7:50:52 PM PDT by Northern Alliance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Toby06

"At twelve cents a pound for bulk delivered ANFO, that's 58,000 pounds worth, very roughly. I could pop about 10,000 tons of quarry rock with that. Sure it's more efficient in a 6" blast hole, but I would not want a family member in the building when it went off."

I'm bettin' they were buying sacks.


9 posted on 09/13/2006 7:51:57 PM PDT by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: World_Events

Well I suppose if some overzealous law enforcement agents caught on to these guys and a gunfight broke out in an effort to capture them, there would be a bit of explaining to do up in headquarters.


10 posted on 09/13/2006 7:53:34 PM PDT by SamAdams76 (The Program is Morally Good)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dljordan

Double the cost, it's still a hell of a pop.

Given 7000 bucks at $.25 a pound, and figure on an average specific gravity of 1, that works out to about 64 each 55 gallon drums of anfo.

Damn, very conservatively figure half the cost went to caps & detonaotrs, etc, you still have 30 plus drums full of ANFO.

Still sticking with your bet?


11 posted on 09/13/2006 8:02:34 PM PDT by Toby06
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Toby06
Given 7000 bucks at $.25 a pound, and figure on an average specific gravity of 1, that works out to about 64 each 55 gallon drums of anfo.The stuff was in a large Ryder van, not a big truck like was used in the WTC and OKC bombings. It wasn't 28,000 pounds of AN. In fact, the story says they only paid $700 for 2,450 pounds of fertilizer. That's 49 fifty pound bags.

They bought them in *at least* two establishments, and one of them *still* reported the sale to the BATFE. 25 bags of fertilizer is probably close to a single pallet of it.

25 years ago, I used to buy such yard chemicals at a suburban "farm, yard and garden store" which was a sort of left over from when the area was more rural. They'd have 10 of pallets of the stuff, or similar stuff on hand.

If you are worried about dangerous stuff, don't forget the thousands of gallons of gasoline in that fuel truck next to you on the freeway.

12 posted on 09/13/2006 9:07:33 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Ex-Dem

What purity were they able to buy?

I was told by an explosives expert that simply by diluting down the ammonium nitrate to about 95% purity would essentially negate its usefullness as an explosive.


13 posted on 09/13/2006 9:15:33 PM PDT by Pikachu_Dad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ex-Dem
I read the full article, and the ammonium nitrate distributor did in fact get suspicious about the purchase the undercover cops made, and contacted the ATF. The "plot" was able to progress past that point because the NYPD told the ATF that it was an undercover op and basically called them off.

"This is entirely plausible except that it wouldn't work"

The stupidity of all this is mind boggling. Your average engineer could do some exceedingly nasty things but has absolutely no motivation to do so.

Fortunately, those with motivation are seventh century barbarians who could only accomplish what they did because our political leadership and security bureaucracy steadfastly refused to acknowledge what was going on in plain sight.

Ammonium nitrate is harmless compared to political skulduggery and bureaucratic incompetence.

14 posted on 09/13/2006 9:19:48 PM PDT by hopespringseternal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pikachu_Dad
I was told by an explosives expert that simply by diluting down the ammonium nitrate to about 95% purity would essentially negate its usefullness as an explosive.

Why would that be considering that dynamite is stabilizer with nitroglycerine diffused through it?

15 posted on 09/13/2006 9:25:24 PM PDT by Centurion2000 (Property tax is feudalism. Income taxes are armed robbery of the minority by the majority.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: hopespringseternal

"Your average engineer could do some exceedingly nasty things but has absolutely no motivation to do so."

For whatever reason I'm ALWAYS seeing new ways of creating havoc and mayhem and distruction. It wouldn't be hard, expensive, or too risky of getting caught. Even back in the old PLO plane hijackings and stuff I was always amazed that as open as our country is we don't have more terrorist attacks. I honestly wonder why that is.


16 posted on 09/13/2006 10:01:34 PM PDT by geopyg (If the carrot doesn't work, use the stick. Don't wish for peace, pray for Victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Ex-Dem
"...But the purchase of the ammonium nitrate in Rensselaer aroused some suspicion from the owner of the distribution plant, who contacted the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms following the purchase. The ATF launched an investigation, but the NYPD notified them that it was an undercover operation..."

Exactly! Their so-called 'undercover-operation' was over at that instant. All the additional driving and talk was useless bullshit. They were busted..................FRegards

17 posted on 09/13/2006 10:33:01 PM PDT by gonzo (.........Good grief!...I'm as confused as a baby in a topless club!.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Toby06

"Still sticking with your bet?"

I respect your figures but I still don't think it would bring down a skyscraper. Maybe something smaller. You'd have to CUT the support beams and ANFO is really slow. It pushs instead of slices. It would certainly crack the concrete around them. You'd have to place it around every support beam not just put it in a big pile.

I've never used ANFO only stick and binary so I'm no expert.


18 posted on 09/14/2006 6:39:07 AM PDT by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: World_Events

Sounds like a 'rice bowl' stunt.

As in "Give us more Homeland Security money"

Had the ATF not been called off, would they have been able to track down the buyers?

Blech


19 posted on 09/14/2006 9:15:42 AM PDT by ASOC (The phrase "What if" or "If only" are for children.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: geopyg
. I honestly wonder why that is.

Because historically there is pretty much no upside to it. Look at Pearl Harbor. Look at 9/11. Timothy McVeigh. Whatever your goal, you have to be completely blind to think you can kill indiscriminately and get what you want.

Bin Ladin and his ilk are delusional. Sure, we might end up electing a democrat who will tuck tail and run, but every time they have a successful attack on the scale of 9/11, they will infuriate people even more and make them that much slower to forget.

It is worth pointing out that the democrats a playing a losing game as well. If they win, their platform pretty much guarantees another attack, which will only destroy their credibility.

The bottom line is that almost anyone smart enough to get the education to do something really bad just has better things to do than kill people.

20 posted on 09/14/2006 6:19:55 PM PDT by hopespringseternal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson