Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Clara Lou
What is the logic of rejecting a treatment that prevent CANCER?

Puritannical hogwash. If the situation was reversed, and men got cancer from HPV, the vaccine would have been mandatory the day it was developed.

14 posted on 09/13/2006 4:57:51 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Wolfie
If the situation was reversed, and men got cancer from HPV, the vaccine would have been mandatory the day it was developed.

Utter nonsense.

49 posted on 09/13/2006 5:45:09 AM PDT by Sloth ('It Takes A Village' is problematic when you're raising your child in Sodom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Wolfie

>>>What is the logic of rejecting a treatment that prevent CANCER?
Puritannical hogwash. If the situation was reversed, and men got cancer from HPV, the vaccine would have been mandatory the day it was developed.>>>

LOL!! You are right. But as it stands, the 'sluts deserve cancer' attitude here is sickening.


55 posted on 09/13/2006 5:56:57 AM PDT by sandbar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Wolfie; Jeff Gordon; Abathar; mombonn; bvw; hunter112

Males can't, of course, get cervical cancer, but virtually every female who gets HPV gets it from a male carrier. So why isn't it mandatory for all the males to be vaccinated?


203 posted on 09/13/2006 9:55:17 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Good Sex: a constitutive element of a Good Sacrament.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson