xzins provided a clear interpretation of what the guy actually said, and is probably the only poster up to post 21 who actually critically read the article, and provided no commentary. Why do you jump all over xzins for interpreting what you either can't or were too lazy to?
Think damnit.
I don't need xzins distilling the content of the of the post, and I find your reply to me to be vaccuous at best.
If you think this crowd control weapon should be tested here first, I encourage you to create an angry mob, designate the time and place in advance, and write the secretary and volunteer to be a part of said testing.
When you do that, get back to FR and post your impressions.
Think damnit.