Skip to comments.
Princeton Professor Singer: And I repeat, I would kill Disabled Infants
LifeSiteNews
| 9/12/06
| John-Henry Westen
Posted on 09/12/2006 4:28:08 PM PDT by wagglebee
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-151 next last
To: wagglebee
Slippery slope.. Educated evil fool.
41
posted on
09/12/2006 4:54:36 PM PDT
by
TASMANIANRED
(The Internet is the samizdat of liberty..)
To: INSENSITIVE GUY
If he had his way, he would be doing it in the United States today.
42
posted on
09/12/2006 4:55:06 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: Aussie Dasher
What was the topic of your debate? Was it a fair debate?
"Stange fellow!"
Evil fellow.
43
posted on
09/12/2006 4:55:14 PM PDT
by
This Just In
("that protectionism, socialism, and communism are basically the same plant" The Law; F. Bastiat)
To: somniferum
Oh those insightful "Progressives"... wanting to "progress" our society back to the times of the Spartans.Yes let's bathe the children in wine and leave the weak ones on the mountainside.
To: wagglebee; All
MUST READ:
"The Sanctity of Life"
http://www.utilitarian.net/singer/by/200509--.htm
http://www.utilitarian.net/singer/
[During the next 35 years, the traditional view of the sanctity of human life will collapse under pressure from scientific, technological, and demographic developments. By 2040, it may be that only a rump of hard-core, know-nothing religious fundamentalists will defend the view that every human life, from conception to death, is sacrosanct.]
This man is dangerous.
45
posted on
09/12/2006 4:56:50 PM PDT
by
khnyny
To: wagglebee
46
posted on
09/12/2006 4:57:09 PM PDT
by
VOA
To: wagglebee
I can't help but think that this (whatever in the hell he is) just likes to say outrageous things to get publicity.
To: msnimje
"So does that mean we can kill people who have become disabled later in life?"
We'd best decide soon. The abortion survivor generation is coming to where they will be supporting their parent's generation and I have no reason they will treat us any better than our generation treated them: wanted, live; a burden, die.
48
posted on
09/12/2006 4:58:54 PM PDT
by
caseinpoint
(Don't get thickly involved in thin things.)
To: OldPossum
Read post #45
I believe he's dangerous. If Mr. Singer wanted publicity, he could have simply accompanied Boy George to a Drag Race. That would have made the headlines even in a monastery.
49
posted on
09/12/2006 5:02:36 PM PDT
by
This Just In
("that protectionism, socialism, and communism are basically the same plant" The Law; F. Bastiat)
To: wagglebee
(excerpt)
The mother of Princeton bioethics professor Peter Singer is lucky
that her son is an hypocrite.
Her son is a leading proponent of excising the undesirable
the imperfect via abortion, infanticide, and euthanasia.
The disabled would fall under there, also, sometimes, the elderly.
Peter Singer's mother has Alzheimer's.
http://www.nationalreview.com/interrogatory/schweizer200510250827.asp
50
posted on
09/12/2006 5:02:57 PM PDT
by
VOA
To: wagglebee
Well, then he (and others like him) may be ridding himself one of the greatest joys they'll ever have.
I have a disabled child, and she is a joy!!! She is one of the hardest working people I have ever met, and she works with a great attitude. She rarely complains about working harder than other kids.
She is really cute also, and lots of fun to be around. She loves going riding roller coasters and hiking, and basically is into adventures.
To: Aussie Dasher
"He told me a good portion of his family were killed by the Nazis, then went on to preach philosophy straight from Hitler's mouth.."Interesting, in a sick sort of way.
Gives me wild thoughts that a Stockholm syndrome gene could exist.
52
posted on
09/12/2006 5:10:37 PM PDT
by
labette
(The land of the Free and the home of the Brave just a little while longer please.)
To: This Just In
Singer is a vegetarian and animal rights supporter. He also gives away a certain portion of his income to charity. Singer thinks he's an ethical guy. Take a good look at the Godless liberal ideology, Singer epitomizes it in so many ways.
53
posted on
09/12/2006 5:11:32 PM PDT
by
khnyny
To: wagglebee
54
posted on
09/12/2006 5:16:00 PM PDT
by
khnyny
To: darkangel82
Well, because he is busy being a bioethics prof at Princeton, and writing books and giving lectures.
The man is also very busy being a hypocrite.
His own mother has Alzheimer's but is still alive (thank God for his sister b/c otherwise Singer has said that he would kill his mother...excuse me, help her pass, but he hasn't b/c his sister won't allow it). He lectures about how we should all be living off of 40K/year and give the rest to stop world hunger...it is our fault that Africans are starving b/c we won't send all of our money....he says this with a 6 figure salary from Princeton, a house in Princeton, an apartment in NY and who knows where else and he makes mucho $$ off of his books/speaking, but he has yet to live off of 40K. He says he will when everyone else starts to do it...so much hypocrisy so little time.
Singer is all about moral relativism, infanticide (up to the age of 1 and for all babies if they are distressing to the mother), euthanasia and bestiality (if the animal isn't harmed!)
Singer is a Marxist and that is the nicest thing I can say about the scum bag.
55
posted on
09/12/2006 5:18:11 PM PDT
by
socialismisinsidious
( The socialist income tax system turns US citizens into beggars or quitters!)
To: socialismisinsidious
Every liberal elite in the MSM and elsewhere adhere to Singer's "philosophy". The left's talking points seem to mirror Singers opinions almost exactly. Marxist is correct, and he is a huge hypocrite.
Read his writings and learn about the enemy I guess. Dangerous.
56
posted on
09/12/2006 5:29:18 PM PDT
by
khnyny
To: socialismisinsidious
He is what the courts used to call 'criminally insane' before that term became un-PC.
57
posted on
09/12/2006 5:30:42 PM PDT
by
darkangel82
(Higher visibility leads to greater zottability.)
To: wagglebee; All
Let me take this opportunity to alert all freepers on this thread right now, Peter Singer is the darling of organizations like the Humane Society of the U.S., PETA, Fund for Animals (which just became a part of the HSUS).
There are a lot of freepers who actually believe the HSUS is about helping animals in catasrophies (sp) like Katrina, and all the time. They are about ANIMAL RIGHTS, which is an entirely different animal than ANIMAL WELFARE.
Do not send the HSUS money, send it to the local animal shelters if you want to actually help animals.
To: darkangel82
in a sane society singer would be locked in the madhouse basement
59
posted on
09/12/2006 5:58:07 PM PDT
by
Charlespg
(Civilization and freedom are only worthy of those who defend or support defending It)
To: wagglebee
"...That's why there is a major ethical problem with dairy
products."
Pathetic beyond the pale!
Maybe he will develope a soy allergy!
60
posted on
09/12/2006 6:08:20 PM PDT
by
Domestic Church
(AMDG...praying he gets "el kabonged" by God and comes to his senses)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-151 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson