Skip to comments.
Interview of the Vice President by Tim Russert, NBC News, Meet the Press (Transcript)
Yahoo/PRNewswire ^
| Sunday September 10, 4:53 pm ET
| Press Release
Posted on 09/10/2006 3:37:09 PM PDT by fight_truth_decay
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
To: kellynla
Rove/Bolton '08
21
posted on
09/10/2006 4:07:04 PM PDT
by
ThreePuttinDude
()...Hey Libs........NO FITZMAS FOR YOU.....()
To: fight_truth_decay
I tried to watch but I did not watch because Meathead Russert was browbeating Cheney.
22
posted on
09/10/2006 4:12:34 PM PDT
by
GinaLolaB
(Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends. — Jesus: John 15:1)
To: fight_truth_decay
>>>>>" Q Should I be relieved you didn't bring your shotgun in today? (Laughter.)
THE VICE PRESIDENT: I wouldn't worry about it. You're not in season. (Laughter.)"<<<<<
I would be very supportive of not only a Season but a bounty on vermin such as tim or chris or a smaller bounty on shehans, rathers or any other terrorist sympathizers.
TT
To: fight_truth_decay
Q Should I be relieved you didn't bring your shotgun in today? (Laughter.) CHRISTIAN4BUSH: I'm not.
(further comments about Mr. Russet Potato will get me banned.)
24
posted on
09/10/2006 4:14:51 PM PDT
by
Christian4Bush
("Ma'am, you don't have to thank us. You just go beat him for us." Soldier to Irey re: Murtha)
To: Christian4Bush
When Russert questioned Cheney about PlameGate, Cheney should have asked Tim if it was true he lied to the Grand Jury.
26
posted on
09/10/2006 4:17:52 PM PDT
by
GretchenM
(What does it profit a man to gain the whole world and lose his soul? Please meet my friend, Jesus.)
To: Blue Turtle
"its amazing how many times our elected officials have to go on tv to explain this war to the idiots that don't get it."
Its not that they don't get it. The idiots know what the war is about, but they can't admit it. To them, its all about votes.
Forget about security, just anything they can say and do to get those talking points out.
I pray the liberals don't take back the congress. If they do, I think we all have a lot to fear.
But, thousands of voters don't get Fox News, they only get the local news.
ABC, CBS and NBC can spout lies all day long, every day of the year and pretty soon it begins to sound like truth.
What do we do to stop it!
To: xtinct
And even if true; 54% is not an "overwhelming" majority. IMO, it is a bare majority.
28
posted on
09/10/2006 4:23:36 PM PDT
by
tiki
To: SoCalPol
29
posted on
09/10/2006 4:25:07 PM PDT
by
snugs
((An English Cheney Chick - BIG TIME))
To: tiki
Absolutely within the margin of error plus how many Republicans were in the survey.
30
posted on
09/10/2006 4:27:55 PM PDT
by
snugs
((An English Cheney Chick - BIG TIME))
To: fight_truth_decay
Interesting that the first two polls, which Tim cited as being 'overwhelming' were actually within the margin of error, huh? I'd hate to be the guy who has to spend Monday getting the smell of red herring off that set.
To: fight_truth_decay
...Q How about Richard Armitage who has come forward and said that he was the original source for Robert Novack some years ago? THE VICE PRESIDENT: Does he need a pardon?...
LOL!
It's at this point that I envisioned the vice president reaching over and giving Tim a noogie.
32
posted on
09/10/2006 4:35:12 PM PDT
by
aligncare
(In warfare, the only moral stance is to win)
To: aligncare
August 27, 2006-Blogger Free Frank Warner has put up a Five-Dollar Yellowcake Challenge:
"I have $5 for the first person who can name one thing, anything, Joseph Wilson found on his 2002 trip to Niger that proved false President Bushs 2003 State of the Union statement, The British Government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa.
"Its the safest five-dollar bill in my bank."
To: fight_truth_decay
I seriously question the morals of anyone who pretends to believe that the world was safer with Saddam Hussein in charge of Iraq.
If we had had Bill Clinton as Commander-in-Chief for the past five years and he removed Saddam, we'd be hearing nothing but cheers and words of praise for our noble leader bringing peace and democracy to the under appreciative middle east.
34
posted on
09/10/2006 5:11:08 PM PDT
by
spinestein
(Follow The Brazen Rule!)
To: aligncare
Glad I didn't watch this. I wonder how many millions they pay him to ask the same questions without any reference to what is going on now.
35
posted on
09/10/2006 5:19:52 PM PDT
by
ClaireSolt
(Have you have gotten mixed up in a mish-masher?)
To: stephenjohnbanker
Daniel Patrick Moynihan was what I would call a statesman. I have a feeling that he would be turning over in his grave if he could see what the Democrat party has become.
36
posted on
09/10/2006 5:41:42 PM PDT
by
srmorton
(Choose life!)
To: ClaireSolt
This can end very easily.
Bush needs to go on TV and make a speech to the entire nation regarding the Senate Report.
1. The administration never said Iraq was involved in 9/11.
2. Iraq and Al Queada had ties and that Hussein was paying suicide bombers families 25k each.
3. Iraq had training facilities for Al Queada pre war.
The problem is the lefties parsed it out.
37
posted on
09/10/2006 6:02:48 PM PDT
by
EQAndyBuzz
(Mediacrat - A leftwing editorialist who pretends to be an objective journalist.)
To: fight_truth_decay
Do the libs, dems, etc., think Bush and Cheney have some kind of crystal ball? You go with the intel you have, and sometimes things don't go as planned. The key is to be ready to respond and go with your gut. It's WAR Timwit, not one since the beginning of time has ever always "gone as planned".
Also, we're getting tired of the same old questions. How about bringing on one or two of the people you agree with and give them the third degree some time? It could be an interesting show as long as they could hide the 'wink, winks'.
38
posted on
09/10/2006 6:11:41 PM PDT
by
boatbums
(Isn't saying 'Mean People Suck'...kinda mean?)
To: srmorton
Daniel Patrick Moynihan was what I would call a statesman. I have a feeling that he would be turning over in his grave if he could see what the Democrat party has become.
He was a completely overated bloviating hypocritical gasbag who voted for every liberal welfare and spending program and was in favor of Gun Control
39
posted on
09/10/2006 6:15:11 PM PDT
by
uncbob
To: xtinct
Tim said, "And look at that, overwhelmingly, 54 percent, a clear majority, believe we are creating more terrorists." The real question is, how many terrorists would there be today if we had not engaged them 5 years ago? If we had done nothing, there would be many more than there are today. For one thing, we've killed a lot of them. For another, the terrorists were gaining strength and their attacks would have a bandwagon effect. How many prospective Islamic terrorists decided to quietly lay back after seeing how severe our response has been? Don't see Gallup or MSNBC asking too many people that question.
The entire hypothetical question is so misleading and irrelevant.
40
posted on
09/10/2006 6:50:16 PM PDT
by
TravisBickle
(Are you talkin' to me?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson