Posted on 09/08/2006 10:10:21 PM PDT by TaxachusettsMan
A group of leading American historians today sent the following letter to Mr. Robert Iger of ABC. Stressing the significance of the "traumatic" events of 9/11, the signers of this letter are calling on Mr. Iger to stand up for responsible media treatments of such important historical moments and withdraw the program from circulation. The growing list of signatories will be updated at openlettertoabc.blogspot.com.
The text of the letter follows.
Dear Robert Iger:
We write as professional historians, who are deeply concerned by the continuing reports about ABC's scheduled broadcast of "The Path to 9/11." These reports document that this drama contains numerous flagrant falsehoods about critical events in recent American history. The key participants and eyewitnesses to these events state that the script distorts and even fabricates evidence into order to mislead viewers about the responsibility of numerous American officials for allegedly ignoring the terrorist threat before 2000.
The claim by the show's producers, broadcaster, and defenders, that these falsehoods are permissible because the show is merely a dramatization, is disingenuous and dangerous given their assertions that the show is also based on authoritative historical evidence. Whatever ABC's motivations might be, broadcasting these falsehoods, connected to the most traumatic historical event of our times, would be a gross disservice to the public. A responsible broadcast network should have nothing to do with the falsification of history, except to expose it. We strongly urge you to halt the show's broadcast and prevent misinforming Americans about their history.
Sincerely,
Arthur Schlesinger Sean Wilentz, Princeton University Michael Kazin, Georgetown University Lizbeth Cohen, Harvard University, Nicholas Salvatore, Cornell University; Ted Widmer, Brown University; Rick Perlstein, Independent Scholar; David Blight, Yale University; Eric Alterman, City University of New York. Maurice Isserman, Hamilton College (List in formation)
Where were these moronic idiots when Fahrenheit 911 came out? This story is a non-starter. Just more Commie crap from the panicked leftwing kooks. Schlesinger is a big DemocRATic hack. Always has been. He can't be believed about anything.
What I find most stunning in all of this is that now five years after the real 9/11 - as if any fiction could somehow make more searing what each and every one of us lived with our own eyes and ears..
What I find the most stunning is that he is still using that phrase "searing", as in "It is seared, seared in my memory." LOL!
In the meantime, the children are now wondering if the "rodent" Kerry saved by mouth to mouth and wound up "never the same" had been passed some genetic defect in the process of the procedure.
Where's the fully respected Paul Krug?????
Now where have we heard that before!
You're in good company, aren't you.
"Historians"? They are nothing but revisionists.
" remember marveling at Father (formerly Congressman) Robert Drinan of the Jesuits going before the Senate to explain why lying about oral sex was a virtue to cultivate in sitting (or maybe standing) Presidents."
Sure. A Jesuit President gets plenty of Jesuit support.
Sheesh, all this is like re-living the "alternate universe" that was the Clinton years. For example:
Bruce Lyndsey's letter to ABC saysClinton "authorized the use of force". And he asserts that Clinton and Berger "had authorized Tenet to 'get' Bin Laden".
In Clintonese fashion both statements are somewhat true. The Clintonistas, in their own minds, authorized the use of force to "get" OBL. But we also know that there was a whirlyjig quality to that authorization that left CIA in the lurch. It was NEVER made clear what exactly field agents were authorized to do. They could "use force"...but did that include assasination? Emphatically, no. They could capture, but we know that Clinton didn't think we had the goods to indict OBL. So what was a field agent to do?
The only enlightenment to come of this whole sorry episode has been to remind me of the slithering quality of the Clintonese language.
OMG...What a monumental, colossal ass. This is the man who invited Michael Moore to his presidential nomination convention as a guest of honor.
The Hil/Alinsky thread was posted three years ago. It has gone the distance since then. Countless eyes have seen it.
Thanks for posting this timely 2008 election reminder. Candidates, particularly, need a refresher course in the evils of moral relativism. It seems to infect those who seek power.
In this perilous age, voters might heed the wisdom of Chesterton: "The lowest of individual vices is the desire to coax and corrupt, and to drag others down to their level."---G.K. Chesterton
Good catch. These "historians" point out that the individuals who are portrayed in the film say that there are inaccuracies, and then go on to rationalize that the film shouldn't be shown based on the protrayed individuals' statements. Those individuals consisting mostly of known liars, of course.
Not only friends of Bill, but backbencher or has-been liberals in the professional historical community as well. It's funny that they're making this pompous appeal based on a "secondary source" that they have not even seen yet. Kinda like damning a book before even reading it...
I haven't read all the way through the thread yet, but Arthur Schlesinger and Sean Wilentz absolutely did.
didn't know that old whore whistorian Schlesinger was still alive ... the list shown should be proof positive why no responsible parent should send his kid to an Ivy League school.
It will be interesting to see how many of these "historians" also ended up signing the letter against Clintoon's impeachment.
This idiot was the "compromise" candidate to address my law school graduation (university would not let us have who we wanted). It pretty much sums up the law school, IMO. The only good thing, for some reason the PA quit working when he gave his speech, or at least the graduating class could not hear it.
Isn't the first job of every historian to GET THE FACTS RIGHT? Then the work of writing history begins. Did I miss something? Or did they?
Congressman Billybob
Latest article: "The Hazleton Case: the People vs. the ACLU"
Please see my most recent statement on running for Congress, here.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.