To: quantim
IIRC, O+ is a universal donor and should be OK.
O- is universal donor .... O+ is universal recipient.
17 posted on
09/08/2006 7:56:14 PM PDT by
msnimje
(What part of-- "DEATH TO AMERICA" --do the Democrats not understand?)
To: pepperdog; msnimje
O- is universal donor .... O+ is universal recipient. Just looked it up in one of my textbooks...
O- is the universal donor. AB+ is the universal recipient.
76 posted on
09/08/2006 9:33:48 PM PDT by
Triggerhippie
(Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.)
To: msnimje
O+ is universal recipient. That is wrong! You have it reversed.
81 posted on
09/08/2006 10:45:47 PM PDT by
cpdiii
(Socialism is popular with the ruling class. It gives legitimacy to tyranny and despotism.)
To: msnimje
88 posted on
09/09/2006 5:26:51 AM PDT by
FreedomPoster
(Guns themselves are fairly robust; their chief enemies are rust and politicians) (NRA)
To: msnimje
AB+ is the universal recipient.
92 posted on
09/09/2006 6:01:15 AM PDT by
Clara Lou
(Only a fool creates ill will unnecessarily.)
To: msnimje
You would think the Doctors would be explaining this, that there blood types that can give to any other and also receive from any other.
The problem is (I believe) in the Ph factor, which is why shots are probably necessary.
97 posted on
09/09/2006 7:56:30 AM PDT by
fortheDeclaration
(Am I therefore become your enemy because I tell you the truth? (Gal.4:16))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson