Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

USS Enterprise Aircraft Destroy Taliban Targets in Afghanistan
Navy Newsstand ^ | 9/5/2006 2:19:00 PM | USS Enterprise Public Affairs

Posted on 09/05/2006 2:54:19 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity

Story Number: NNS060905-09
Release Date: 9/5/2006 2:19:00 PM

USS ENTERPRISE, At Sea (NNS) -- Aircraft assigned to Carrier Air Wing (CVW) 1 stationed aboard USS Enterprise (CVN 65) provided support to International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) troops on the ground as part of Operation Medusa in Afghanistan that began Sept. 3.

In concert with coalition air forces, F/A-18C Hornets from the “Sidewinders” of Strike Fighter Squadron (VFA) 86, based in Beaufort, S.C., conducted precision strikes on a known Taliban position near Kandahar.

The “Sidewinders” joined other coalition and Enterprise-based aircraft that have conducted strikes in southern Afghanistan in support of Operation Enduring Freedom while protecting ISAF ground troops. Other CVW-1 aircraft continue to fly command and control, surveillance and reconnaissance and aerial tanking missions.

“The Enterprise Strike Group team is prepared to effectively support ground forces in Operation Enduring Freedom by whatever means are possible,” said Capt. Mark Wralstad, commander, CVW-1. “Our air power, combined with the effectiveness of the ground forces, is proving to be a substantial force.”

Recently, Taliban extremists operating in the vicinity of Kandahar have employed new, more aggressive tactics, including suicide bombings on unprotected civilian targets. The air strikes underscore the success Enterprise-based aircraft have had working with ISAF troops on the ground since the strike group’s arrival in the theater Aug. 28.

“Enterprise Strike Group returned to this theater less than a week ago, but ready to accomplish any mission at any time,” said Rear Adm. Ray Spicer, commander, Enterprise Carrier Strike Group. “Whether we are protecting coalition troops on the ground, conducting planned strikes on known terrorist sites or providing support for humanitarian relief operations, we will continue to do our part to help set the conditions for security and stability so the Afghan people have the opportunity to determine their own future.”

Since their arrival in the northern Arabian Sea, Enterprise-based aircraft have focused their efforts on protecting ISAF ground forces near Kandahar.

In addition to the “Sidewinders” of VFA-86, other squadrons of CVW-1 include the “Checkmates” of VFA-211, the “Knighthawks” of VFA-136, the “Thunderbolts” of Marine Strike Fighter Squadron (VMFA) 251, the “Screwtops” of Airborne Early Warning Squadron (VAW) 123, the “Rooks” of Electronic Attack Squadron (VAQ) 137, the “Maulers” of Sea Control Squadron (VS) 32, the “Rawhides” of Carrier Logistics Support (VRC) 40, and the “Dragonslayers” of Helicopter Anti-Submarine Squadron (HS) 11.

The Enterprise Strike Group is currently operating in the northern Arabian Sea in support of maritime security operations and Operations Iraqi and Enduring Freedom.

For related news, visit the Commander, U.S. Naval Forces Central Command/Commander, U.S. 5th Fleet Navy NewsStand page at www.news.navy.mil/local/cusnc/.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: gwot; kaboom; oef; owned; usn; ussenterprise
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

060607-N-9742R-024 Persian Gulf (June 7, 2006) - Lt. Matt Roberts and Aviation Ordnanceman Senior Chief Clovis Ash observe an F/A-18C Hornet, assigned to the Sidewinders of Strike Fighter Squadron Eight Six (VFA-86), launching from the flight deck of the nuclear-powered aircraft carrier USS Enterprise (CVN 65). Enterprise and Carrier Air Wing One (CVW-1) are currently deployed as part of a routine rotation of U.S. maritime forces in support of global war on terrorism, as well as conducting Maritime Security Operations (MSO) in the region. U.S. Navy photo by Photographer's Mate 2nd Class Milosz Reterski (RELEASED)
1 posted on 09/05/2006 2:54:20 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

Photon torpedoes or phasers?


2 posted on 09/05/2006 2:57:13 PM PDT by Nomorjer Kinov (If the opposite of "pro" is "con" , what is the opposite of progress?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity; Junior
Bravo Zulu!

Ping, Navy, Unofficial.

3 posted on 09/05/2006 2:57:31 PM PDT by Gumlegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

Is using billion-dollar weaponry to attack yurt-dwellers with AK-47s a 'proportionate response?" Israel wants to know.


4 posted on 09/05/2006 3:02:57 PM PDT by gcruse (http://gcruse.typepad.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nomorjer Kinov

Gotta wonder if that ship's chief engineer always gets called "Scotty."


5 posted on 09/05/2006 3:04:19 PM PDT by BeHoldAPaleHorse ( ~()):~)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

Just wondering - are we basing strike aircraft on the ground in Afghanistan?


6 posted on 09/05/2006 3:04:26 PM PDT by Stingray51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nomorjer Kinov

Lock phasers and have the photon torpedoes on standby, Mr. Chekov.


7 posted on 09/05/2006 3:06:19 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity ("Sharpei diem - Seize the wrinkled dog.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

Way to go, Big E!


8 posted on 09/05/2006 3:06:58 PM PDT by cloud8 (Proud Navy Dad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

Way to go, Big E!


9 posted on 09/05/2006 3:08:28 PM PDT by cloud8 (Proud Navy Dad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

10 posted on 09/05/2006 3:08:39 PM PDT by monkapotamus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
The Big "E"


11 posted on 09/05/2006 3:08:58 PM PDT by llevrok (When you take my gin from my cold, dead hand....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nomorjer Kinov
Photon torpedoes or phasers?
---
Both. We don't like the people there at the receiving end.
12 posted on 09/05/2006 3:14:48 PM PDT by Cheburashka (World's only Spatula City certified spatula repair and maintenance specialist!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

Target practice for the "squeeze play" on Iran!


13 posted on 09/05/2006 3:16:31 PM PDT by DTogo (I haven't left the GOP, the GOP left me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BeHoldAPaleHorse
Gotta wonder if that ship's chief engineer always gets called "Scotty."
---
What about the pointy prosthetic ears the XO has to wear?
14 posted on 09/05/2006 3:23:44 PM PDT by Cheburashka (World's only Spatula City certified spatula repair and maintenance specialist!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Stingray51
Just wondering - are we basing strike aircraft on the ground in Afghanistan?

A10s mistakenly hit Canadian troops the other day. I doubt they came off carriers
15 posted on 09/05/2006 3:25:33 PM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DTogo
The fates protect children, fools, and ships named Enterprise.
16 posted on 09/05/2006 3:36:37 PM PDT by Talking_Mouse (wahhab delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: uncbob

Good point; but there are also neighboring and not so neighboring countries.


17 posted on 09/05/2006 3:37:57 PM PDT by Stingray51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
I see the old barge is still out there doing what they built her for.

Today, as you go about your daily business, give a thought to the poor SOBs sweating away down in the depths of #4 MMR.

Sail on, Big E.

B-Chan
Former MM3, USS ENTERPRISE (CVN-65)

18 posted on 09/05/2006 3:39:24 PM PDT by B-Chan (Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B-Chan
No doubt. When I graduated prototype in 1990 and got sent to the George Washington, the Enterprise was such a fixture in Newport News Shipyard that it was called "Building 65". For the 4 years that I was stationed on GW (going through christening, sea trials, shakedown, commissioning, workups, and 6 month deployment), I never saw the Enterprise move an inch.

And yes, I feel for the guys sweating their butts off in the MMR, which I did plenty of on the GW. The chowdales thought it was hot topside. Try making a day of it in the engine room while the boat is in the Caribbean or Persian Gulf.

19 posted on 09/05/2006 3:54:45 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity ("Sharpei diem - Seize the wrinkled dog.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: NCC-1701

Ping to real-life good stuff for your namesake.


20 posted on 09/05/2006 3:55:44 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (the war on poverty should include health club memberships for the morbidly poor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson