Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Older fathers 'raise autism risk'
BBC ^ | 9/4/6

Posted on 09/05/2006 7:13:51 AM PDT by ZGuy

Children with older fathers have a significantly increased risk of having autism, a study has concluded. The UK and US researchers examined data on 132,271 children and said those born to men over 40 were six times more at risk than those born to men under 30.

They said the study in Archives of General Psychiatry was further proof men also had "biological clocks".

One UK expert said the study could be important in understanding the genetic mechanisms underlying autism.

Autism and related conditions, known as autism spectrum disorders, have become increasingly common, affecting 50 in every 10,000 children as compared with five in 10,000 two decades ago.

Increased awareness and changes in the way the disorders are diagnosed are thought to play a major role in the increase, but the researchers say it may also be linked to other changing factors.

Older parental age has previously been linked to abnormalities in the brain development of children.

Genetic fault

The researchers, from Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, and the Institute of Psychiatry at King's College London, looked at data on 132,271 children born in Israel during the 1980s.

All men, and three-quarters of women born in these years were assessed by the draft board at age 17, during which time any disorders were recorded.

The board also took information on the ages of their father and mother, and took into account factors such as year of birth and socioeconomic status.

Among those whose fathers were between 15 and 29 when they were born, the rate of autism was six in every 10,000, rising to nine in every 10,000 when fathers were aged 30 to 39 (1.6 times higher).

In the group whose fathers were aged 40 to 49, the rate rose to 32 in 10,000 (5.75 times higher).

The rate appeared to be even higher when fathers were aged over 50, but the researchers said the sample size was very small.

The mother's age did not appear to influence the chances a child would have autism.

The researchers suggest there may be a genetic fault which is more common with age.

This might be spontaneous mutations in sperm-producing cells or alterations in genetic "imprinting," which affects gene expression.

'Convincing evidence'

The team, led by Dr Avi Reichenberg from the IoP, said: "It is important to keep in mind that age at paternity is influenced by the socio-cultural environment and varies across societies and over time.

"In a given population, a change in the socio-cultural environment could produce a change in paternal age at birth.

"In theory, it could thereby lead to a change in the incidence of genetic causes of autism."

He added: "Although further work is necessary to confirm this interpretation, we believe that our study provides the first convincing evidence that advanced paternal age is a risk factor for autism spectrum disorder."

Professor Simon Baron Cohen, of the Autism Research Centre in Cambridge, said: "The finding of a significant association with advancing paternal age is one that should be straightforward to test in other samples, to see if this result from a purely Israeli sample generalises to other populations.

"If confirmed, it could have important implications for the genetic mechanisms underlying autism."


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: autism; disorders; fatherhood; sperm
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last
To: Hildy

It just goes to show that they are desperate for reasons and they are lashing out at anything that they can. The males sperm, in my opinion, has nothing to do with it. And also, I think it wrong to put blame on one gender.


41 posted on 12/13/2006 11:25:21 AM PST by copperisme (With the light of day later comes the darkness of night.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Global2010

That's right, blame the woman.

Just like for centuries it was women's fault when the men didn't have any boys.

Too bad they found out it is the man's fault.


42 posted on 12/13/2006 11:30:42 AM PST by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: RepoGirl
It's a stat. It can happen to anyone, even remotely.

"In the group whose fathers were aged 40 to 49, the rate rose to 32 in 10,000 (5.75 times higher)."

There is still a fat chance of having an autistic child due to being an "overage" daddy. So it's not as if it's epidemic. This stat is just 0.3% of the "elder" population. Not even worth really worrying about. It's greater than the younger, but still tiny.

43 posted on 12/13/2006 11:43:27 AM PST by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Paradox
Maybe you might be interested in some of these links on older fathers and risks of problems for offspring???????? http://press.psprings.co.uk/jech/october/851_ch45179.pdf
Many problems have been associated with having children,later not earlier. 35 for both men and women is beginning to be later. See James F.Crow http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/94/16/8380
This information about risks of older parenting is not new,but it has been hidden for some reason. http://humrep.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/13/9/2371.pdf

There is research to look at if one has an open mind and if one realizes that autism is not one thing, or one gene, or if the genes exists mildly already in a person one can have an more autistic child at 20. So, maybe the older a man the more mutations in his sperm and the less ability to kill off the mutated sperm.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6T6K-4B52S86-P&_coverDate=12%2F31%2F2003&_alid=481273960&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_qd=1&_cdi=5033&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=113136870c266c7b8005023fc27a06d8
Yes, young engineer types will tend to have more autistic children, but maybe also 36 +++ men who are lawyers, and not scientists. This all does not mean that there aren't plenty of very non-autistic people with fathers who were in theirlate 30s, 40s, 50s, 60s ++. This information is not meant to blame older fathers, but knowledge is power. It takes a lot of time and will to begin to sort this issue out.
44 posted on 12/15/2006 7:40:24 PM PST by pema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: the OlLine Rebel
In most of the research on autism it has been noted that the fathers were much older than average(this is when they thought mother's were to blame). In one small study done in Sweden the mothers mean age was 30.7 and the father's mean age was 34. Gillberg 1980. Both of these ages were much older than the mean age of the unaffected population.
Here is a recent article on the Reichenberg study.
http://www.intelihealth.com/IH/ihtIH/WSIHW000/35320/63153/491833.html?d=dmtHMSContent

The article below discusses some background on the issue http://list.web.net/archives/mnchp-l/2004-April/000508.html Finding out what is behind some of the cases of the disabling form of autism is not about blame.
45 posted on 12/15/2006 9:00:54 PM PST by pema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson