To: redgolum
Look, you can stand by your beliefs, lose, then stand by as another 40 million children are murdered.
Or, you can vote for something else and watch the nuber steadily go down.
Those are your choices, period.
So, you want to see 40 million more die for your beliefs?
29 posted on
09/05/2006 11:38:23 AM PDT by
cspackler
(There are 10 kinds of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.)
To: cspackler; cpforlife.org; wagglebee
If I vote for someone who is (assuming the article is correct, which it may not be) 100% behind ALL abortions in the first trimester, as opposed to someone is open to all the rest, how many babies would be saved?
Hint, most abortions are in the first trimester.
Let me put it this way. Say that there were to candidates. One wanted absolutely free euthanasia, another only wanted limited euthanasia. Would you vote for the one who only wanted to kill grandpa, or the one who wanted to kill little Johnny if his acne got to bad? Isn't murder always wrong, or only when it is convenient in winning political races.
You are saying by not supporting a pro infanticide candidate, I am supporting a pro infanticide candidate. So I might as well vote for the one who will keep my taxes low.
I will ask you one more time. What core beliefs are you willing to sacrifice to win? What is the line where you will say "This far and no further" in support of the party? If there is no line, nothing you will stand on, then fine. Say it.
30 posted on
09/05/2006 11:50:27 AM PDT by
redgolum
("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson