Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Eyes Nuclear Power to Meet Growing Energy Demands
VOA ^ | Aug. 30, 2006 | Stephanie Ho

Posted on 09/01/2006 10:32:36 PM PDT by FairOpinion

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: Cobra64
My apologies. The one line got my attention.
21 posted on 09/02/2006 2:38:07 PM PDT by Prost1 (Remember, a democrat is a friend if it is time to vote or you have money to take.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

"What is the count of new US nuke plants begun? Last number I saw was eight."

There hasn't been a nuke plant even sent in for consideration for almost 20 years IIRC.


22 posted on 09/02/2006 3:14:15 PM PDT by lawdude (There are limits to intelligence but none to stupidity... Hannity and Colmes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: lawdude

Eight have begun since this time last year, unless there are more.


23 posted on 09/02/2006 4:19:36 PM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Thanks for the info.

Very interesting, that we are using hardly any oil for our electricity generation.

If we could drill in ANWR and off shore, we could be energy independent.


24 posted on 09/02/2006 4:24:09 PM PDT by FairOpinion (Dem Foreign Policy: SURRENDER to our enemies. Real conservatives don't help Dems get elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

None have begun since this time last year. ZERO. Planning has begun, but no orders have been placed.


25 posted on 09/02/2006 4:29:46 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64
What cave has this jerk been hiding in for the last 30 years.

Look up his bio. I think he understands it better than you do.

26 posted on 09/02/2006 4:31:48 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

Depends what begin means. Duke has begun work on three.


27 posted on 09/02/2006 4:31:52 PM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64
What cave has this jerk been hiding in for the last 30 years. It takes YEARS to build a nuke plant. Don't these fools understan planning?

Exactly. It takes years. And US electric demand is not likely to go down, which means we need to start NOW.

28 posted on 09/02/2006 4:56:22 PM PDT by SauronOfMordor (A planned society is most appealing to those with the arrogance to think they will be the planners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: coloradan

Good observations. I was young at the time of Three Mile Island but old enough to remember when some terrified relatives from Harrisburg fled to our place in NJ for safety.

That's what I was referring to - some of the very same people who experienced that episide cannot rationally adjust to changed circumstances. At the time of TMI (I think it was a Dr. Denton) a prominent nuclear physicist tried to calm people -- to no avail.


29 posted on 09/02/2006 5:41:53 PM PDT by T.L.Sink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

"Eight have begun since this time last year, unless there are more."

Nuclear plants??? Your source of info?


30 posted on 09/03/2006 4:48:05 AM PDT by lawdude (There are limits to intelligence but none to stupidity... Hannity and Colmes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

About damn time.

Fusion Energy is clean and efficent.


31 posted on 09/03/2006 4:54:31 AM PDT by roaddog727 (Bullsh## doesn't get bridges built.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
It's high time.

Agree completely! Its PAST time.

However, the Enviro-Luddites will either start with their usual stalling tactics and demonstrations then, if the nuclear energy policy gets any traction, they'll get so many provisions added on through lobbying as to make any plants unworkable or uneconomical.

Sorry for the pesimism.

32 posted on 09/03/2006 4:59:16 AM PDT by DoctorMichael (A wall first. A wall now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lawdude

I am just keeping count. Aside from the three from my company Duke there are five other tally marks on the wall.


33 posted on 09/03/2006 7:44:45 AM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

Lots of talk. No firm orders.


34 posted on 09/03/2006 11:54:10 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson