Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Questions About Inquiry in C.I.A. Leak
The New York Times ^ | September 2, 2006 | By DAVID JOHNSTON

Posted on 09/01/2006 8:50:56 PM PDT by rightgrafix

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-194 last
To: rightgrafix
Patrick J. Fitzgerald, the prosecutor, knew the identity of the leaker from his very first day in the special counsel’s chair, but kept the inquiry open for nearly two more years before indicting I. Lewis Libby Jr., Vice President Dick Cheney’s former chief of staff, on obstruction charges.

Hopefully Libby can successfully sue Fitzgerald for malicious prosecution.

181 posted on 09/02/2006 1:50:49 PM PDT by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stultis
Hey, either explanation seems plausible to me. In addition, here are some others:

1. What if (as some here have opined) there really is a huge anti-Bush cabal within the government? If so, throwing Armitage and Powell to the wolves deflects from deeper digging.

2. Since the 2008 political season is already in play, and since Armitage has signed on with McCain, and since due to the polls the Rats think McCain is the frontrunner (more fools they) perhaps this is a misguided effort to derail McCain, causing a supposed fight within the GOP. (As I said, this could only be the motivation if the media is starting to believe their own lies and are ignoring what Republicans have been saying since 2002.)

3. A mysterious, unknown motivation caused by undercurrents that have yet to surface. This goes to my point of us not knowing a lot of the things happening.

4. Isikoff's publisher wanting to salvage some profit from an otherwise lame and irrelevant book.

I will also cheerfully accept any other theories. Things are now so weird that anything seems possible.

182 posted on 09/02/2006 2:24:46 PM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: woofie

there isn't much time. its very hard to turn public opinion, the left has lied and beat this issue to death - with no rebuttal from the white house at all, how many times have we heard the president say this was a "serious investigation" when he talked about white house cooperation with it.


183 posted on 09/02/2006 2:29:06 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth
and I just think that somehow Hillary is involved...



I'm with you all the way with those thoughts.

I'm trying to think back to when the 'Wilson/Plame' conspiracy first broke what was the scandal the Clintons were involved with at that time that needed a diversion to get attention away from them?

Slick and Hitlery have both been very quiet concerning the 'Plame case which is usually a signal that they're at the root and behind the latest scandal being loudly broadcast over the MSM
184 posted on 09/02/2006 3:19:24 PM PDT by AmeriBrit ( What happened to 'Able Danger'? and which Clinton has all the missing FBI files?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
They all sound plausible to me too. And much as I hope my first idea is correct (since it would mean that the NSA leaker is in the sights of the DOJ) if I had to place a bet right now I think I'd go with:
4. Isikoff's publisher wanting to salvage some profit from an otherwise lame and irrelevant book.

Which, btw, makes Isikoff (or at least his publisher) a whole lot smarter than Valerie "Natasha" Plame, who bet her book deal on nailing "Moose and Squirrel".

185 posted on 09/02/2006 3:58:44 PM PDT by Stultis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: Dolphy; Not gonna take it anymore

You're welcome!

Seems there is much more to many of these BDS events than can be readily discerned and, you're right, what is omitted is sometimes more revealing than what is stated.

I was hoping the original poster of this article would remember something about it and chime in. Before posting the article again, I was checking the links to make sure they still worked and found it stripped to bare bones from what was originally there. The difference took me aback, to say the least.


186 posted on 09/02/2006 4:04:57 PM PDT by windchime (One war~many fronts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Tinian
I also think they're sending a message to the Wilsons to drop their civil suit before members of the press have to start making depositions.

I suspect you are right about that, as well.

There is a certain "dead horses should be buried, not beaten" quality to the article...

187 posted on 09/02/2006 5:34:25 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple

Armitage is toast, and if "Amnesty John" McCain is dumb enough to have him on his campaign staff, McCain is showing how much dumber he is now than he was in 2000.

Colin Powell is also toast. No political future for him in either party.

Fitzgerald is totally discredited even though most likely nothing will happen to him -- he will just disappear into the woodwork.

Judith Miller must feel like the complete idiot she is. Ditto Cooper.

Bush wins another victory for the history books, though it will take two generations for that to come out.


188 posted on 09/02/2006 9:04:02 PM PDT by detch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

Two important points:

1. Armitage sat quietly and let the SP go forward *knowing* he was the source. He deliberately chose not to inform the White House.

2. How long has the NYT known about this story? I say from the beginning.


189 posted on 09/03/2006 3:18:03 AM PDT by ARW3A
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

I want the US Justice Department to open a probe of Fitzgerald's prosecutorial ethics in this matter. It reeks to high heaven of injustice!


190 posted on 09/03/2006 3:35:16 PM PDT by Rapscallion (What America now faces is far worse than the lowest point in the Cold War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AmeriBrit

First of all there has never been ONE instance of these files being used. I realize it shatters a favortite FR myth which blames EVERY odd action by a politician on the dreaded omnipotent FBI files but any intelligent person knows that they have no more bearing upon reality than a unicorn.

Typical silliness.


191 posted on 09/04/2006 10:54:48 AM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Cap Huff

I'm surprised Jefferson hasn't claimed the money came from his share of helping a Nigerian bureaucrat take his money out of Nigeria. I get those offers all the time.


192 posted on 09/04/2006 11:01:00 AM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Sal

We were shown many instances of the Clinton's goon squads in operation and none needed FBI files to do their work. The famed files of fable and fantasy only went half way down the alphabet in any case.


193 posted on 09/04/2006 11:13:48 AM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit

Maybe Jefferson is the guy that has been sending those messages out . . .


194 posted on 09/04/2006 2:24:30 PM PDT by Cap Huff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-194 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson