Posted on 09/01/2006 6:46:03 AM PDT by AZRepublican
Hunh...? Paging Walter Pincus... Mr. Walter Pincus... is Mr. Pincus in the room?
Will Senator McCain now drop Armitage (and Powell who knew and also kept quiet) from his foreign policy team? Will some enterprising journalist (oxymoron) please ask.
Frickin' jerks. You know, even if some person in the Bush administration did "reveal" her name, I never understood the big scandal anyway. Wasn't she just a glorified secretary?
That's really good.
music: DA-DAH-DAAAAAAAAAHHHH!
"Discredit"= "explain" in newspeak.
The Post's second stage of the recovery process would be learning how to write in English. But they seem to have made the first step towards recovery. ("I am the Washingron Post and I am a Bushaholic".)
I am amazed.
Now where are the front page stories asking why Powell and Armitage didn't come forward and stop this fiasco when it started, it seems both of them knew the truth.
I have been steadily cooling on McCain and this involvement with Powell and Armitage has been the nail in the coffin for him as far as I'm concerned.
And I said as much in response to an email solicitation I rec'd last night from the StraightTalk Express.
It would sure be nice to get some Straight Talk out of Colin Powell and Richard Armitage as to why they kept silent for so long.
Regarding their departure from the administration:
Did they walk the plank or were they pushed?
Priceless! THAT is the picture that should be front and center on Drudge.
I just looked out my window and could have sworn I saw a bovine looking creature flapping wings about 30 yards in the air. Hmmm.
How much stuff has gone on just recently or fairly recently? From Dan Rather to doctoring photos to sucking up to the stinkin' Iranian jerk to a million other tricks they play on a daily basis. They are all beyond pathetic.
There was quite a bit of that going on.
Editorial: Armitage's error doesn't excuse others He made a mistake, but Cheney, Rove, Libby have no excuse.
To hear Bush administration defenders tell it, news that Richard Armitage was the original source of the leak of Valerie Plame's CIA work means the entire Plamegate tempest was a whole lot of nothing. That spin should be a tough sell, if folks pay attention to the facts. Armitage is a former Navy officer who served with distinction in various high-ranking defense and diplomatic posts under Presidents Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush. In chitchat at the end of a conversation with newspaper columnist Robert Novak in 2003, while deputy secretary of state, Armitage let slip that Valerie Plame, wife of Iraq war critic Joseph Wilson, worked at the CIA. Armitage apparently did not know Plame's CIA work was undercover and classified.
So there you go, administration supporters say: There was no conspiracy to "out" Plame as part of a plan to "get" Wilson. So far as Armitage goes, that makes sense. He appears to have made a foolish, forgivable mistake, though why he remained silent about it is mystifying.
But Armitage's error does not lift the thick layer of Plame-related gunk from the reputations of White House adviser Karl Rove, Vice President Dick Cheney and his ex-chief of staff, Lewis Libby. While Armitage had no anti-Wilson ax to grind, they did. In fact, Armitage learned about Plame's CIA association from a memo written in response to a request from Cheney's office for information about Wilson. The White House's "get Wilson" effort was already underway. Armitage's slip offered them an opportunity of which they made maximum use.
Novak needed confirmation of Armitage's information. He got it from Rove. Between them, Rove and Libby peddled the story to various Washington reporters, insinuating that Wilson's CIA-sponsored trip to Niger to investigate possible Iraq purchases of uranium was a junket arranged by his wife -- and that Wilson was a has-been showboat who just wanted a free trip to Africa, where he had worked as a U.S. diplomat.
Wilson may be a showboat, but he is also an experienced African hand who was sent on a legitimate mission by the CIA (not by his wife), and convincingly disproved the Niger-Iraq uranium stories central to the Bush case for war -- stories Bush used long after he had reason to know they were false. For that, the White House tried to smear him, and it used liberally the opening provided inadvertently by Armitage. Libby apparently lied about the effort and got caught. The others may not have broken federal law, but they certainly showed, if anyone needed further proof, how low they will stoop to smear a critic rather than argue an issue on its merits.
They are trying to run from the real story here. The media being a de facto arm of the DNC and spreading false anti Bush myths.
Lies...all Lies!!!!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.