Posted on 08/30/2006 3:46:09 AM PDT by billorites
TWO DAYS after Aug. 10 -- when British authorities broke up an alleged plot to blow up multiple aircraft over the Atlantic Ocean -- the "moderate" Muslim establishment in Britain published an aggressive open letter to Prime Minister Tony Blair.
It suggested that Blair could better fight terrorism if he recognized that current British government policy, especially with regard to "the debacle of Iraq," provides "ammunition to extremists." The letter writers demanded he change his foreign policy to "make us all safer." One prominent signatory, Labour MP Sadiq Khan, added that Blair's reluctance to criticize Israel increased the pool of people from which terrorists can recruit.
In other words, Islamists working within the system exploited the thwarted Islamist terror plot to pressure the British government to implement their joint wishes and reverse British policy in the Middle East. Lawful Islamists shamelessly leveraged the near-death of thousands to forward their agenda.
Despite its reported fears of Muslim street unrest, the Blair government heatedly rejected the letter. Foreign Secretary Margaret Beckett called it "the gravest possible error." Foreign Office minister Kim Howells dismissed it as "facile." Home Secretary John Reid deemed it a "dreadful misjudgment (to think that the) foreign policy of this country should be shaped in part, or in whole, under the threat of terrorism activity." Transport Secretary Douglas Alexander rejected the letter as "dangerous and foolish."
Undaunted, the "moderate" Muslim establishment pushed even harder on the domestic front. In an Aug. 14 meeting with high government representatives, including the deputy prime minister, it made two further demands: that a pair of Islamic religious festivals become official holidays and that Islamic laws pertaining to marriage and family life be applied in the United Kingdom. A Muslim present at the meeting later warned the government against any plans to profile airport passengers, lest this step further radicalize Muslim youths.
Why these ultimata and why at this time? The leader of the Aug. 14 Muslim delegation, Syed Aziz Pasha, explained his group's logic: "We told (the politicians) if you give us religious rights, we will be in a better position to convince young people that they are being treated equally along with other citizens." More ominously, Pasha threatened the government leaders. "We are willing to co-operate but there should be a partnership. They should understand our problems, then we will understand their problems."
The press reacted furiously to these demands. The Guardian's Polly Toynbee condemned the open letter as "perilously close to suggesting the government had it coming." The Daily Mirror's Sue Carroll portrayed Pasha's position as "perilously close to blackmail."
This was not the first such attempt by "moderate" British Muslim leaders at political ju-jitsu, to translate Islamist violence into political clout. The same happened, if less aggressively, in the aftermath of the July 2005 London bombings, when they piggybacked on the death of 52 innocents to demand British forces out of Iraq.
That pressure did succeed, and in two main ways. First, the Home Office subsequently issued a report produced by "moderate" Muslims, "Preventing Extremism Together," that formally accepted this appeasing approach. As Dean Godson of Policy Exchange summarizes the document, Islamist terror "provided a wonderful, unexpected opportunity for these moderates to demand more power and money from the state."
Piggybacking on terror worked, second, in that a recent poll shows 72 percent of British subjects now accepting the Islamist view that Blair's "backing for action in Iraq and Afghanistan" has made Britain more of a target for terrorists, while a negligible 1 percent say the policies have improved the country's safety. The public solidly backs the Islamists, not the prime minister.
I have argued that terrorism generally obstructs the progress of radical Islam in the West by stimulating hostility to Muslims and bringing Islamic organizations under unwanted scrutiny. I must admit, however, that the evidence from Britain -- where the 7/7 terrorism inspired more self-recrimination than it did fury against jihad -- suggests that violence can also strengthen lawful Islamism.
And here's another reconsideration: while I maintain that the future of Europe -- whether continuing in its historic Christian identity or becoming an adjunct of Muslim North Africa -- is still an open question, the behavior of the British public, that weakest link in the Western chain, suggests that it, at least, may be too confused to resist its Londonistan destiny.
OUTSTANDING article! Internal Enemies Devices. Thanks for posting.
bttt
The U.S. version is CAIR.
Accepting their status as Dhimmi.
Good article. And this doesn't affect just the UK. Every time we have a mini-jihadi attack here (such as the shootings at the Jewish Center in Seattle or yesterday's rampage in SF), the press fills up with apologies to Muslims, as if they had been the offended parties!
Furthermore, seeing how easy it was to get the Fox journalists to "convert" and then make glowing statements about Islam has also no doubt convinced Muslims everywhere that we have no principles, no spirit to resist them, and that they are our lawful masters. And many Americans and Brits (especially those in official power) seem to be simply shrugging and saying, ok, if that's how they want it.
The traditional Brits are voting with their feet, they're leaving the country, immigrating out.
Turn out the lights, the party is over.
I moved back home after living and working in England for just over ten years and all this BS about the UK is just not true.
Muslims make up a tiny proportion of the UK population, less than 3% and are mainly in cities. According to the CIA Factbook the UK is over 92% white christian anglo-saxon celtish. Muslims have been tolerated there for many years, but it is clear that the Brits have had enough now and the tide is turning. Many Brits I spoke to said they owed people from ex-empire countries a chance, but the muslims have taken advantage and they are now living on borrowed time. I wish our government had a fraction of the anti-terrorist powers the UK forces have, but the liberals here block them at every turn.
It's easy to underestimate the Brits because they don't shout and their govt doesn't hold a press conference every 5 minutes like ours, but they will defeat this enemy from within, make no mistake.
Good news then. I hope you are correct.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.