Printer-friendly versionPosted on 08/29/2006 7:21:23 PM PDT by StopGlobalWhining
Beyond science and economics: Conference to examine the ethical dimensions of climate change
Tuesday, August 29, 2006
University Park, Pa. -- Most of the discussion and debate about climate change centers on scientific scenarios, such as struggling eco-systems, violent storms and melting glaciers, or economic factors which range from the cost of alternative fuels to impact on gross domestic product. Largely missing, however, are explorations of the ethical implications of the actions or inactions of individuals and the world community as they consider solutions to a crisis of unparalleled proportions.
On Aug. 30 and 31, experts on many dimensions of climate change will gather at the Florida Hotel in Rio de Janeiro for one of the first international meetings to focus on those ethical implications. The Ethical Dimensions of Climate Change (EDCC) collaborative program at Penn State’s Rock Ethics Institute is sponsoring the event in conjunction with the International Virtual Institute on Climate Change, the Brazilian Forum on Climate Change, and the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro-The Energy Planning Program.
Several times throughout his movie, “An Inconvenient Truth,” Al Gore asserts that climate change policy is a moral problem. But, how many and what types of moral and ethical issues does climate change policy-making raise, do policymakers have an understanding of these issues, and what practical difference would it make if ethical questions were integrated into the growing scientific and economic literature of climate change policy options?
According to organizers, EDCC was created in 2005 because:
• Human-induced climate change raises many profound ethical questions, yet these ethical issues have not been addressed adequately in climate change policy debates or in growing scientific and economic climate change literature;
• Given that those most responsible for climate change are not the same people as those most vulnerable to adverse climate change impacts, an equitable approach to climate change may be practically necessary to achieve a globally acceptable climate change solution;
• Climate change policy options are often discussed exclusively in the languages of science and economics, thereby overlooking or obscuring important ethical questions.
• The ethical dimensions of climate change must be expressly considered in climate change policy making to assure just climate change solutions and responses.
The upcoming Rio meeting of EDCC and its partners was convened specifically to gather the advice of climate change experts from developing countries as the group examines ethical issues that must be faced in developing climate change policy. Among other issues, this meeting will look at the ethical dimensions of the following climate change issues:
• Responsibility for Damages: Who is ethically responsible for the consequences of climate change, that is, who is liable for the burdens of a) preparing for and then responding to climate change (i.e., adaptation) or b) paying for unavoided damages?
• Atmospheric Targets: What ethical principles should guide the choice of specific climate change policy objectives, including but not limited to, maximum human-induced warming and atmospheric greenhouse gas targets?
• Allocating GHG Emissions Reductions: What ethical principles should be followed in allocating responsibility among people, organizations, and governments at all levels to prevent ethically intolerable impacts from climate change?
• Scientific Uncertainty: What is the ethical significance of the need to make climate change decisions in the face of scientific uncertainty?
• Cost to National Economies: Is the commonly used justification of national cost for delaying or minimizing climate change action ethically justified?
• Independent Responsibility to Act: Is the commonly used reason for delaying or minimizing climate change action that any nation need not act until others agree on action, ethically justifiable?
• Potential New Technologies: Is the argument that we should minimize climate change action until new, less-costly technologies may be invented in the future, ethically justifiable?
• Procedural Fairness: What principles of procedural justice should be followed to assure fair representation in decision-making?
EDDC is currently collaborating with 15 institutions around the world and seeks additional collaboration from other organizations and individuals. For more information on EDCC, go to http://rockethics.psu.edu/climate/index.htm .
|
Contact Nancy Tuana ntuana@la.psu.edu http://rockethics.psu.edu/climate/index.htm |
|
Contact Vicki Fong vfong@psu.edu http://live.psu.edu |
A presentation by experts in philosophy and ethics at COP-11 this week, sponsored by the Tides Foundation and Penn State's Rock Ethics Institute, made it clear that it is, in their view, unethical for the industrialized countries of the world to threaten the health and well being of poor countries by releasing so much carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. Even if the threat has only a low probability of being realized, they argue, the only ethical course of action is to stop this "risky" activity. But just as command-and-control approaches by governments have historically hurt humanity, we can see that once again governments are ignoring the negative unintended consequences of the proposed "solutions" to the problem.
Dr. Roy Spencer is a principal research scientist for the University of Alabama in Huntsville and the U.S. Science Team Leader for the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer (AMSR-E) on NASA's Aqua satellite. In the past, he has served as Senior Scientist for Climate Studies at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama.
Ping
The ethical question for the Global Warming liars is how much money can they bilk out of world citizens for their scam.
None from me.
The climate has ethics?
This sounds very cereal!!
Why should we live in detached single family homes with running water while the poor in Cameroon and Bangladesh can't afford to because of American greed and selfishness?
I agree that the "global warming lemmings" need to change their strategy.
Most Americans have not been deceived by their pseudo-scientific arguments and most Americans have not been converted by their "holier-than-thou" moralistic Jeremiads.
So I think it's time for those lemmings to try something else: "leading by example"!
For example, if, at the end of this "Ethics" conference, all of the participants commit suicide together in a well-orchestrated photo-op, then we would finally KNOW that they really WERE "serious" about their cause.
This bloody, but "ethical", rejection of what they see as an un-worthy world would (no doubt) inspire a sense of "guilt" in some, who might (as a result) downsize from their SUVs to Vespas -- thereby SAVING our world!
And there is no downside here, since these "ethicists" would, through their self-sacrifice, entirely CEASE their own participation in the conversion of carbohydrates to CO2 that is soooo typical of living organisms.
Let's take care though to ensure that the bodies of these noble "ethicists" are NOT cremated.
Fat chance of that happening!
Remember when Barbara Striesand issued a statement urging everyone to stop using clothes dryers and instead hang their wash outside on a clothes line to dry?
And then some guy flew an airplane low over her Malibu estate and took pictures showing that she had no clothes lines. Her response was that she meant it for average people, she didn't intend it to include herself.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.