If you would have read the entire thread you would have seen that another Freeper had already called him a Troll - and LIKELY hit the abuse button.
THAT'S why I commented that I was surprised to see the account still active.
btw, did I say BITE ME?
While I don't know how far is too far. Their was a thinly described anti-American sentiment right from the start of DorkBorg's first comment.
I hadn't hit the abuse because I figured I would wait for him/her to more clearly out himself.
It's not an inexperienced blogger. It's first post seeks to enlighten us on how good the UN could be if given a chance (kind of like Marxism LOL).
It's a TROLL and sooner or later I would imagine its going to get ZOTTED.
I'ld love to be wrong but then again I'ld love to be rich too.
BTW, you weren't behaving like one of the bullies, and I should not have implied you were.
But you were ready to jump on their bandwagon pretty quickly.
Maybe that poster will be engaged by the debates going on here and learn from it.
Not everyone comes to FR with total knowledge of all the right and wrong in the world.
Not everyone comes to FR with exactly the same opinions as (for instance) you.
Not everyone on FR is an instant, perfect, TROLL spotter, such as (for instance) you.
TROLLS are a problem, sometimes, other times they are fun to play with. The most destructive TROLLS string on the most ardent FR (hardcore conservatives) posters, getting them to act just like those we criticize. (Like, DU)
I would not like to see FR become like DU. That is what prompted my reaction to your snap judgment.
I did read the post prior to yours where 'troll' was stated.
I just didn't think it was justified.
I also read your latest post where you were a much better 'host' or ambassador for Free Republic.
In that, you have given the new poster 'a fair shake'.
Thank you.